CELEUS: Certifiable and Efficient LLM Evaluation via E-Processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Can we trust evaluation scores to capture an LLM's true real-world performance? Certifiable evaluation answers this question by providing guarantee for LLM evaluation. In particular, existing methods sequentially curate evaluation samples and keep updating confidence intervals (CIs) that cover the true performance with high probability (e.g., 95%) until some conditions are satisfied, e.g., the CI width reaches a target precision. However, existing methods are not generally anytime-valid: the claimed coverage (e.g., 95%) may fail when CIs are repeatedly updated and used to decide when to stop, leaving a gap between theoretical rigor and practice. This paper bridges this gap by proposing Celeus, a Certifiable framework for Efficient LLM evaluation, which leverages E-processes to build anytime-valid CIs. Concretely, we propose signals that combine two ingredients: (i) Uncertainty-guided sampling to select informative samples for evaluation, and (ii) Surrogate-assisted approximations for unevaluated samples. We prove that such signals remain unbiased for the evaluation score conditional on the past, enabling statistically-grounded and anytime-valid e-process CIs. More importantly, the two ingredients reduce estimation variance and help reach the target precision with fewer evaluated samples. We also prove that CIs obtained by Celeus can shrink at a near-parametric rate up to logarithmic factors and analyze the oracle variance-optimal sampling rule that motivates the empirical uncertainty-guided one. Experiments show that Celeus reaches the target precision using 54-62% fewer evaluated samples than baselines, while preserving anytime-valid coverage.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2026.
Builds on
0 of 40 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Rank Confidence Sequences:Anytime-valid Leaderboardscited by 2
- 2026Anytime-Valid LLM Leaderboards via Benchmark-weighted and Block-Factorized e-Processescited by 1
- 2026On Evaluating and Improving Conversational Agents in Productioncited by 0
- 2026Cheap to Draw, Expensive to Trust: Certifying Test-Time Scaling Curvescited by 0
- 2026Are We Testing Too Much? A Survey of Benchmark Compression for Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Are We Testing Too Much? A Survey of Benchmark Compression for Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Models13 Oct 2026
- 2026Cheap to Draw, Expensive to Trust: Certifying Test-Time Scaling Curves30 Sep 2026
- 2026Anytime-Valid LLM Leaderboards via Benchmark-weighted and Block-Factorized e-Processes26 Sep 2026
- 2026Rank Confidence Sequences:Anytime-valid Leaderboards26 Sep 2026
- 2026On Evaluating and Improving Conversational Agents in Production25 Sep 2026