Learning Splitting Heuristics for Parallel String Solvers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
String constraint solvers are crucial for reasoning about string-manipulating programs. However, many practical string constraints are undecidable, and real-world applications often present complex constraints that challenge current solvers. The rise of multi-core architectures offers an opportunity for parallel solving. A key parallel solving method is cube-and-conquer, in which the quality of splitting heuristics is critical to effectively dividing the search space. Unfortunately, manually designing the heuristics is labor-intensive, and handcrafted heuristics are often sub-optimal. This paper introduces a data-driven approach to automatically generating splitting heuristics. We frame the problem of selecting a splitting atom as a learning task, using features from input formulas and dynamic data from solver execution. We implement this approach in two popular string solvers, Z3seq and Z3str4, demonstrating that the learned heuristics outperform manually designed ones in the number of solved formulas and the average solving time.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2026.
Builds on
6 of 75 references.
References · 6
- 2014Understanding Random Forests: From Theory to Practicecited by 57
- 2016Solving and Verifying the boolean Pythagorean Triples problem via Cube-and-Conquercited by 23
- 2013Proteus: A Hierarchical Portfolio of Solvers and Transformationscited by 4
- 2018Decision Procedures for Path Feasibility of String-Manipulating Programs with Complex Operationscited by 4
- 2024Layered and Staged Monte Carlo Tree Search for SMT Strategy Synthesiscited by 3
- 2021Fuzzing Symbolic Expressionscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.