Evolutionary Two-Stage Hyperparameter Optimization Strategies for Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) solve Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) by embedding physical laws into neural network training. However, their performance suffers from unstable convergence, training plateaus, and strong sensitivity to architectural and optimization hyperparameters due to the highly non-convex and multi-term structure of the physics-informed loss. In this setting, the outer-loop hyperparameter search is a noisy and black-box optimization problem over heterogeneous parameters, where classical local or gradient-based strategies are easily trapped in suboptimal regions. Evolutionary algorithms, with their population-based exploration and ability to handle mixed, non-differentiable search spaces, provide a more robust mechanism for discovering promising configurations. We propose and investigate a two-stage approach based on evolutionary algorithms that combines exploration and exploitation parts of PINNs training to improve solution accuracy and robustness under fixed computational budgets. In the first stage, we perform low-fidelity training runs with truncated epochs to rapidly screen candidate configurations, treating hyperparameter selection as a black-box outer-loop problem. In the second stage, only the most promising candidates are fully trained with standard gradient-based optimizers to refine the solution. Evaluated on three popular problems, namely Advection, Klein-Gordon and Helmholtz equations, our method consistently outperforms standard training and achieves significantly lower mean error within constrained computational resources.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2026.
Builds on
12 of 30 references.
References · 12
- 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
- 2021PhyCRNet: Physics-informed Convolutional-Recurrent Network for Solving Spatiotemporal PDEscited by 98
- 2014Freeze-Thaw Bayesian Optimizationcited by 90
- 2023Can Physics-Informed Neural Networks beat the Finite Element Method?cited by 68
- 2023Separable Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 66
- 2022Multifidelity Deep Operator Networks For Data-Driven and Physics-Informed Problemscited by 58
- 2021Multifidelity Modeling for Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs)cited by 25
- 2022Hyper-parameter tuning of physics-informed neural networks: Application to Helmholtz problemscited by 19
- 2025Evolutionary Optimization of Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Evo-PINN Frontiers and Opportunitiescited by 11
- 2023Evolutionary Optimization of Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Advancing Generalizability by the Baldwin Effectcited by 5
- 2024Discovering Physics-Informed Neural Networks Model for Solving Partial Differential Equations through Evolutionary Computationcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.