mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Critical Percolation as a Synthetic Data Model for Interpretability

arXiv 2606.20347 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2026cs.LG cond-mat.dis-nncited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks learn features that reflect the hierarchical, multi-scale structure of natural data. Synthetic datasets used to evaluate interpretability methods typically lack this structure, limiting their value as realistic toy models. To close this gap, we introduce a family of synthetic datasets consisting of hierarchical functions defined on critical mean-field percolation clusters embedded in a high-dimensional data space. The percolation data consists of sparse, low-dimensional fractal clusters with a power-law size distribution. Latent variables modeling a taxonomic hierarchy generate each data point's target value. The data model is analytically tractable with known critical exponents that fix its properties without requiring hyperparameter tuning. We leverage a mapping between percolation clusters, random trees, and additive coalescence to propose an almost linear-time algorithm to jointly sample a random tree and its hierarchical latent decomposition, enabling data generation at arbitrary scale. Using probing experiments, we find that the model's ground-truth latent variables can be linearly decoded from neural network activations. Together, sparsity, self-similarity, power-law statistics, and analytical tractability make critical percolation a principled testbed for interpretability research.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 57 of its 102 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2026.

Builds on

57 of 102 references.

References · 57

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  3. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  4. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
  5. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  6. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  7. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  8. 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
  9. 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 582
  10. 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
  11. 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 522
  12. 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 422
38 more
  1. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
  2. 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 363
  3. 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 334
  4. 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extractioncited by 270
  5. 2022Transformers Learn Shortcuts to Automatacited by 268
  6. 2018Estimating the intrinsic dimension of datasets by a minimal neighborhood informationcited by 250
  7. 2020Spectrum Dependent Learning Curves in Kernel Regression and Wide Neural Networkscited by 200
  8. 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 191
  9. 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 160
  10. 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 143
  11. 2023The Quantization Model of Neural Scalingcited by 138
  12. 2022A Solvable Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 116
  13. 2021Pre-training without Natural Imagescited by 100
  14. 2024A Phase Transition in Diffusion Models Reveals the Hierarchical Nature of Datacited by 93
  15. 2021Learning to See by Looking at Noisecited by 92
  16. 2025Sparse Autoencoders Do Not Find Canonical Units of Analysiscited by 88
  17. 2021Learning Curve Theorycited by 85
  18. 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 1, Learning Hierarchical Language Structurescited by 83
  19. 2023How Deep Neural Networks Learn Compositional Data: The Random Hierarchy Modelcited by 71
  20. 2024Scaling and renormalization in high-dimensional regressioncited by 50
  21. 2024A Mechanistic Analysis of a Transformer Trained on a Symbolic Multi-Step Reasoning Taskcited by 49
  22. 2025From Flat to Hierarchical: Extracting Sparse Representations with Matching Pursuitcited by 49
  23. 2024Towards a theory of how the structure of language is acquired by deep neural networkscited by 39
  24. 2026There Will Be a Scientific Theory of Deep Learningcited by 29
  25. 2024A Percolation Model of Emergence: Analyzing Transformers Trained on a Formal Languagecited by 26
  26. 2019Is Deeper Better only when Shallow is Good?cited by 24
  27. 2026Deriving Neural Scaling Laws from the statistics of natural languagecited by 23
  28. 2024An exactly solvable model for emergence and scaling laws in the multitask sparse parity problemcited by 22
  29. 2024How transformers learn structured data: insights from hierarchical filteringcited by 18
  30. 2024Analyzing (In)Abilities of SAEs via Formal Languagescited by 17
  31. 2025You Are What You Eat -- AI Alignment Requires Understanding How Data Shapes Structure and Generalisationcited by 17
  32. 2025Learning curves theory for hierarchically compositional data with power-law distributed featurescited by 17
  33. 2024Neural Scaling Laws Rooted in the Data Distributioncited by 15
  34. 2025Understanding LLM Behaviors via Compression: Data Generation, Knowledge Acquisition and Scaling Lawscited by 15
  35. 2024Scaling Backwards: Minimal Synthetic Pre-training?cited by 14
  36. 2024How Diffusion Models Learn to Factorize and Composecited by 13
  37. 2025A Survey of Dimension Estimation Methodscited by 12
  38. 2025Understanding sparse autoencoder scaling in the presence of feature manifoldscited by 11

50 most cited of 57 All 57 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.