mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Thermodynamic Measure of Intelligence

arXiv 2606.20231 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2026cs.AI cond-mat.stat-mech cs.ITcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Can intelligence be measured? We propose that intelligence can be defined as the lawful amplification of rare but valid futures: a system increases the probability of outcomes that would be unlikely under passive dynamics but remain admissible under the constraints of the domain. We start with the premise that an intelligent system must model the world and its own place within it. Because the system is part of the world it models, this leads naturally to recursive self-simulation: the system represents futures in which its own actions are part of the trajectory. Our central results give a necessity statement and a conditional near-sufficiency statement connecting this architecture to a precise thermodynamic measure of lawful amplification of rare-valid futures: high rare-valid lift is impossible unless the internal simulation identifies rare-valid futures with high fidelity; conversely, when rare-valid fidelity is high and the simulation contains an effective policy, the achievable lift approaches the actuation-limited optimum. Thus recursive self-simulation is not merely a plausible feature of intelligence but, under the stated assumptions, is necessary and nearly sufficient for high thermodynamic intelligence. The resulting framework makes intelligence measurable on a universal scale, from passive matter and feedback controllers, large language models, and humans as text generators to Maxwell-demon-like information engines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2026.

Builds on

1 of 32 references.

References · 1

  1. 2018A standardized Project Gutenberg corpus for statistical analysis of natural language and quantitative linguisticscited by 64

Built on by

Not cited yet.