mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bidirectional Tutoring for Developmental Motor Learning in Robots: Co-Developed Interaction Dynamics Support Stable Learning

arXiv 2606.19728 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2026cs.RO cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Infants are well known to develop their motor skills through dense interaction with caregivers. Although such social interaction is crucial for human development, motor-skill learning in robots is often treated as a unidirectional process in which robots passively receive demonstrations from tutors. This overlooks a key property of social interaction: it is inherently bidirectional, with tutor and learner dynamically adapting to each other. In such interactions, the robot's past experiences may function as prior constraints that shape the dynamics of their co-developed trajectories. We hypothesize that bidirectional tutoring allows such constraints to guide the formation of consistent behavioral patterns that preserve behavioral coherence and support generalization, whereas unidirectional interaction lacks such constraints and leads to broader, less consistent behavioral patterns. To examine this hypothesis, we conducted two experiments with a physical humanoid robot performing an object manipulation task: one involving human-robot interaction and another employing an AI tutor interacting with the real robot through an adaptive intervention mechanism designed to examine whether similar effects would emerge under more controlled conditions. We implement the developmental learning framework using a free-energy-principle-based neural network extended with generative replay, which supports stable sequence-by-sequence learning from single tutored episodes. Across both settings, bidirectional tutoring fostered consistent behaviors and stage-wise generalization, while the robot gradually required less tutor guidance. These results suggest that bidirectional tutoring, as an embodied and socially grounded approach, provides an effective scaffold for developmental motor learning in robots.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2026.

Builds on

5 of 52 references.

References · 5

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Continual Learning with Deep Generative Replaycited by 1,158
  3. 2022Behavior Transformers: Cloning k modes with one stonecited by 304
  4. 2024Consistency Matters: Defining Demonstration Data Quality Metrics in Robot Learning from Demonstrationcited by 6
  5. 2025Generalization Capability for Imitation Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.