SEAGAN: domain-Specific and Edge-Aware Graph Attention Network for Dynamic Plant Processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph neural networks (GNNs) offer a flexible framework for learning from scientific data with physical, biological, or functional associations. One promising domain is plant physiology, where observed responses result from several interacting processes that are difficult to isolate, even with human intervention. A key example is the A-Ci curve, which relates the net CO2 assimilation rate (Anet) to leaf intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and is also used to estimate photosynthetic parameters in biophysical models. However, accurate estimation requires accurate identification of the active biochemical limiting state at each curve point, which is a major source of uncertainty. Here, we express the limitation-state identification in A-Ci curves as a graph-based node classification problem. A graph representation of the A-Ci curve is created using distance-based k-nearest-neighbor (kNN) and auxiliary-signal-guided (ASG) connectivity. The methodology was evaluated against the conventional machine learning baselines, graph-based architectures, and an automated fitting-based benchmark. Results on a large synthetic dataset with known ground-truth limitation states show that graph-based models improve classification, especially near biochemical transition areas. The top-performing configuration, SEAGAN (domain-Specific and Edge-Aware Graph Attention Network for Dynamic Plant Processes), integrates process-aware node features, edge attributes, kNN connectivity, and graph attention with a weighted cross-entropy loss, obtaining an F1-score of 0.857 and accuracy of 0.882. The results suggest that using A-Ci curves as graphs enables better identification of the biochemical limiting condition and reduces the uncertainty associated with both human and automated methods.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.
Builds on
19 of 58 references.
References · 19
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,318
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,888
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,303
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,143
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,373
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,911
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,422
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,574
- 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,353
- 2021Geometric Deep Learning: Grids, Groups, Graphs, Geodesics, and Gaugescited by 1,147
- 2020Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networkscited by 873
- 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 736
7 more
- 2019Graph U-Netscited by 492
- 2019Crop Yield Prediction Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 29
- 2021A GNN-RNN Approach for Harnessing Geospatial and Temporal Information: Application to Crop Yield Predictioncited by 28
- 2020Deep Multi-view Image Fusion for Soybean Yield Estimation in Breeding Applications Deep Multi-view Image Fusion for Soybean Yield Estimation in Breeding Applicationscited by 9
- 2020Crop Yield Prediction Integrating Genotype and Weather Variables Using Deep Learningcited by 8
- 2023Agri-GNN: A Novel Genotypic-Topological Graph Neural Network Framework Built on GraphSAGE for Optimized Yield Predictioncited by 3
- 2025PhoTorch: A robust and generalized biochemical photosynthesis model fitting package based on PyTorchcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.