A Solver-Free Training Method for Predict-then-Optimize
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a scalable method for training prediction (machine learning) models in the predict-then-optimize paradigm, where model outputs serve as coefficients for a subsequent linear optimization task. Directly minimizing the empirical decision regret is intractable for linear programming and combinatorial optimization since the decision mapping is piecewise constant, and the gradients are zero almost everywhere. While existing methods address this by smoothing the differentiation process, they suffer from scalability issues, since a computationally expensive solver call is required for every gradient evaluation. To address this, we propose a decision-focused learning pipeline based on a measure transformation principle, which yields a new surrogate loss that is completely optimization-solver-free during training. We establish theoretical guarantees, including Fisher consistency and excess risk bounds. Empirically, our method achieves decision quality competitive with state-of-the-art methods while reducing training time by orders of magnitude.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.
Builds on
28 of 40 references.
References · 28
- 2017OptNet: Differentiable Optimization as a Layer in Neural Networkscited by 588
- 2019Differentiable Convex Optimization Layerscited by 458
- 2017Smart "Predict, then Optimize"cited by 332
- 2019Differentiation of Blackbox Combinatorial Solverscited by 224
- 2018Melding the Data-Decisions Pipeline: Decision-Focused Learning for Combinatorial Optimizationcited by 220
- 2014From Predictive to Prescriptive Analyticscited by 142
- 2023Decision-Focused Learning: Foundations, State of the Art, Benchmark and Future Opportunitiescited by 129
- 2019MIPaaL: Mixed Integer Program as a Layercited by 93
- 2019Smart Predict-and-Optimize for Hard Combinatorial Optimization Problemscited by 88
- 2020Interior Point Solving for LP-based prediction+optimisationcited by 83
- 2023A Survey of Contextual Optimization Methods for Decision Making under Uncertaintycited by 81
- 2019Generalization Bounds in the Predict-then-Optimize Frameworkcited by 54
16 more
- 2015Fast rates in statistical and online learningcited by 47
- 2020Fast Rates for Contextual Linear Optimizationcited by 43
- 2021Risk Bounds and Calibration for a Smart Predict-then-Optimize Methodcited by 28
- 2020Automatically Learning Compact Quality-aware Surrogates for Optimization Problemscited by 22
- 2020Risk Guarantees for End-to-End Prediction and Optimization Processescited by 20
- 2023Estimate-Then-Optimize versus Integrated-Estimation-Optimization versus Sample Average Approximation: A Stochastic Dominance Perspectivecited by 19
- 2023Landscape Surrogate: Learning Decision Losses for Mathematical Optimization Under Partial Informationcited by 17
- 2024Decision-Focused Learning with Directional Gradientscited by 16
- 2025Dissecting the Impact of Model Misspecification in Data-driven Optimizationcited by 9
- 2023CaVE: A Cone-Aligned Approach for Fast Predict-then-optimize with Binary Linear Programscited by 8
- 2025Solver-Free Decision-Focused Learning for Linear Optimization Problemscited by 8
- 2024From Inverse Optimization to Feasibility to ERMcited by 3
- 2025Efficient End-to-End Learning for Decision-Making: A Meta-Optimization Approachcited by 3
- 2025The Bias-Variance Tradeoff in Data-Driven Optimization: A Local Misspecification Perspectivecited by 3
- 2025Decision-Focused Bias Correction for Fluid Approximationcited by 3
- 2026Decision-Focused Sequential Experimental Design: A Directional Uncertainty-Guided Approachcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.