mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Information Lattice Learning as Probabilistic Graphical Model Structure Learning

arXiv 2606.19366 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AI eess.SPcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Information lattice learning (ILL) learns interpretable rules of a signal by alternately projecting the signal onto a partition lattice that encodes a hierarchy of abstractions and lifting selected rules back to the signal domain. When the signal is a probability mass function, we show the probabilistic rules learned by ILL admit a natural probabilistic graphical model (PGM) interpretation and develop this interpretation in detail. A partition in ILL induces a deterministic quotient variable, and a rule is the marginal law of that quotient variable. A rule set is therefore a collection of marginal constraints over interpretable abstractions. General lifting is the feasible family of all joint distributions satisfying those constraints, while special lifting chooses a maximum-ignorance reconstruction, implemented in ILL by an L2 uniformity principle closely related to maximum entropy. Under a Shannon-entropy lifting, the same constraints yield a log-linear factor graph whose factors are indexed by learned abstractions. The information lattice itself, however, is not a Bayesian network: its edges encode refinement and coarsening of abstractions, not conditional dependence. Thus ILL is best viewed as structure learning for interpretable constraint-based factor graphs over quotient variables. This view clarifies how ILL relates to graphical models and maximum entropy models, while suggesting new directions for inference, identifiability, and hybrid symbolic-probabilistic learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.

Builds on

3 of 23 references.

References · 3

  1. 2026When Does LeJEPA Learn a World Model?cited by 27
  2. 2022Learning from One and Only One Shotcited by 4
  3. 2013Learning Gaussian Graphical Models with Observed or Latent FVSscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.