mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generalised Eigenvalue Geometry of Semantic Adversarial Attacks

arXiv 2606.19212 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent empirical work shows that semantically equivalent paraphrases can fool financial sentiment classifiers: although a paraphrase remains close to the original under a strong reference embedding, it may shift the target model's representation enough to change the predicted class. Existing robustness theory either assumes a single-model threat model or focuses mainly on empirical attack algorithms. We develop a continuous local model of semantic paraphrase perturbations that captures this two-model structure. We show that the worst-case local displacement of the target representation, subject to a proxy-model budget, is governed by the largest generalised eigenvalue of a matrix pencil (A,B) constructed from the Jacobians of the two embedding maps. The resulting attackability index λ^*(x) is intrinsic to the local paraphrase geometry and the chosen embedders, yields a closed-form prediction-flip condition for affine readouts, and supports conservative population and finite-sample attackability certificates. For uniform control over classes of affine readouts, we derive a distribution-free VC bound for binary attackability indicators and a scale-sensitive margin bound based on an attackability-adjusted margin that subtracts a local geometric penalty from the standard classifier margin. We also connect the continuous theory to discrete paraphrase search, identify an asymmetry between successful and unsuccessful finite searches, and give a covering condition under which the discrete and continuous settings agree. Finally, we propose an empirical verification framework using soft-token relaxations and generated paraphrase sets to assess the local eigenvalue geometry, prediction-flip condition, and finite-search approximation on a deployed financial-text classifier.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.

Builds on

8 of 25 references.

References · 8

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  4. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
  5. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  6. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
  7. 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 446
  8. 2019FinBERT: Financial Sentiment Analysis with Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 385

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.