Generalised Eigenvalue Geometry of Semantic Adversarial Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent empirical work shows that semantically equivalent paraphrases can fool financial sentiment classifiers: although a paraphrase remains close to the original under a strong reference embedding, it may shift the target model's representation enough to change the predicted class. Existing robustness theory either assumes a single-model threat model or focuses mainly on empirical attack algorithms. We develop a continuous local model of semantic paraphrase perturbations that captures this two-model structure. We show that the worst-case local displacement of the target representation, subject to a proxy-model budget, is governed by the largest generalised eigenvalue of a matrix pencil (A,B) constructed from the Jacobians of the two embedding maps. The resulting attackability index λ^*(x) is intrinsic to the local paraphrase geometry and the chosen embedders, yields a closed-form prediction-flip condition for affine readouts, and supports conservative population and finite-sample attackability certificates. For uniform control over classes of affine readouts, we derive a distribution-free VC bound for binary attackability indicators and a scale-sensitive margin bound based on an attackability-adjusted margin that subtracts a local geometric penalty from the standard classifier margin. We also connect the continuous theory to discrete paraphrase search, identify an asymmetry between successful and unsuccessful finite searches, and give a covering condition under which the discrete and continuous settings agree. Finally, we propose an empirical verification framework using soft-token relaxations and generated paraphrase sets to assess the local eigenvalue geometry, prediction-flip condition, and finite-search approximation on a deployed financial-text classifier.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.
Builds on
8 of 25 references.
References · 8
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
- 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 446
- 2019FinBERT: Financial Sentiment Analysis with Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 385
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.