Giskard : Byzantine Robust and Confidential Aggregation for Large-Scale Decentralized Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dealing simultaneously with confidentiality and Byzantine behaviors in decentralized learning is a challenging problem. Indeed, in decentralized learning, clients train a machine learning model while keeping their data locally and share their model parameters or gradients with a set of neighbors. While enforcing confidentiality calls for hiding the exchanged model parameters/gradients (e.g., by using cryptographic techniques), dealing with Byzantine contributions often requires inspecting the latter. Hence, most research works address these objectives separately. A recent line of work proposes to employ secure multi-party computation (MPC) to implement robust aggregators against model poisoning, thereby enforcing both confidentiality and Byzantine resilience. However, these solutions scale badly: they either require all-to-all communication between participants or delegate the entire computation to a small subset, whose computational and communication load grows proportionally with the size of the network. In this paper, we present Giskard, a protocol for confidential and Byzantine-robust decentralized aggregation. Giskard organizes n parties into a tree of committees of size O(log n) and evaluates a coordinate-wise approximate median via a committee-adapted distributed binary search over the value domain, using BGW-style MPC within each committee. We assess Giskard both theoretically by proving its security and confidentiality properties and experimentally through extensive experiments involving up to one million participants. Compared to its closest competitors, Giskard reduces per-party communication complexity asymptotically while exhibiting comparable model utility under up to n/4 Byzantine parties.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.
Builds on
18 of 57 references.
References · 18
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
- 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 509
- 2017Can Decentralized Algorithms Outperform Centralized Algorithms? A Case Study for Decentralized Parallel Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 496
- 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 285
- 2021Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learningcited by 196
- 2018RSA: Byzantine-Robust Stochastic Aggregation Methods for Distributed Learning from Heterogeneous Datasetscited by 148
- 2020Learning from History for Byzantine Robust Optimizationcited by 137
- 2020Byzantine-Robust Learning on Heterogeneous Datasets via Bucketingcited by 125
- 2020Byzantine-Resilient Secure Federated Learningcited by 93
- 2023Fixing by Mixing: A Recipe for Optimal Byzantine ML under Heterogeneitycited by 64
- 2020Byzantine-Resilient Non-Convex Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 56
6 more
- 2024Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 47
- 2021A Unified and Refined Convergence Analysis for Non-Convex Decentralized Learningcited by 43
- 2021EIFFeL: Ensuring Integrity for Federated Learningcited by 26
- 2021Secure Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning via Clusteringcited by 12
- 2024Privacy-Preserving Aggregation for Decentralized Learning with Byzantine-Robustnesscited by 4
- 2025ByzFL: Research Framework for Robust Federated Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.