mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rethinking the Pointer Loss in Table Structure Recognition: Geometry-Aware Pointer Loss for Spatial Locality

arXiv 2606.18721 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Table Structure Recognition (TSR) using a pointer network achieves impressive results by predicting HTML sequences while aligning tags to detected text (or cell) regions. However, our analysis reveals that when pointer networks fail, 79.6% of errors occur between spatially adjacent cells (Manhattan distance <= 2). Despite this, standard cross-entropy loss weights all negative candidates equally. In this work, we propose Geometry-Aware Pointer (GAP) Loss, which reweights the cross-entropy objective based on spatial proximity to ground truth. By applying inverse distance weighting, GAP focuses gradient flow where the model struggles most: immediate neighbors receive stronger gradients than distant cells. Our approach requires only a straightforward modification to the loss computation, maintaining the same model architecture with zero additional inference cost. Extensive experiments on PubTabNet and SynthTabNet demonstrate that GAP consistently reduces adjacent-cell errors, achieving new state-of-the-art performance. Our findings suggest that incorporating geometric inductive biases at the loss level provides a simple yet effective approach to robust TSR. Our code is available at https://github.com/teamreboott/GAP

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.

Builds on

16 of 23 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  2. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  3. 2015Pointer Networkscited by 882
  4. 2019Image-based table recognition: data, model, and evaluationcited by 233
  5. 2022TableFormer: Table Structure Understanding with Transformerscited by 93
  6. 2019Complicated Table Structure Recognitioncited by 91
  7. 2021Split, embed and merge: An accurate table structure recognizercited by 42
  8. 2023Improving Table Structure Recognition with Visual-Alignment Sequential Coordinate Modelingcited by 41
  9. 2021PingAn-VCGroup's Solution for ICDAR 2021 Competition on Scientific Literature Parsing Task B: Table Recognition to HTMLcited by 39
  10. 2023Optimized Table Tokenization for Table Structure Recognitioncited by 34
  11. 2022Robust Table Detection and Structure Recognition from Heterogeneous Document Imagescited by 30
  12. 2021TGRNet: A Table Graph Reconstruction Network for Table Structure Recognitioncited by 27
4 more
  1. 2022GriTS: Grid table similarity metric for table structure recognitioncited by 27
  2. 2023Robust Table Structure Recognition with Dynamic Queries Enhanced Detection Transformercited by 12
  3. 2025TFLOP: Table Structure Recognition Framework with Layout Pointer Mechanismcited by 9
  4. 2025SPRINT: Script-agnostic Structure Recognition in Tablescited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.