Fair Online Resource Allocation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of fair online resource allocation, motivated by applications such as refugee resettlement and airline scheduling, where agents arrive sequentially and must be assigned to facilities with limited capacities. We introduce a model that maximizes the overall welfare subject to resource constraints and a Lipschitz fairness requirement, which ensures that similar agents arriving in the same batch receive similar expected outcomes. We first analyze the offline problem, proving that the value of the optimal fair allocation is at least an Omega(1/γ) fraction of the optimal unfair allocation, where γ is the fairness coefficient, thereby bounding the price of fairness. For the online setting, we propose an algorithm based on dual mirror descent that enforces fairness constraints within batches while estimating optimal dual variables. We prove that this algorithm achieves sublinear regret relative to the optimal offline fluid benchmark. Finally, we validate our theoretical results using real-world data from the Refugee Economies Programme, demonstrating the algorithm's performance and examining the trade-offs between welfare maximization and fairness enforcement.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.
Builds on
13 of 30 references.
References · 13
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2020Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation Problemscited by 51
- 2022A Unifying Framework for Online Optimization with Long-Term Constraintscited by 41
- 2014Fast Algorithms for Online Stochastic Convex Programmingcited by 36
- 2018Individual Fairness in Hindsightcited by 32
- 2020Regularized Online Allocation Problems: Fairness and Beyondcited by 22
- 2021Fair Dynamic Rationingcited by 19
- 2019Fairness and Utilization in Allocating Resources with Uncertain Demandcited by 16
- 2021Sequential Fair Allocation: Achieving the Optimal Envy-Efficiency Tradeoff Curvecited by 15
- 2022Rawlsian Fairness in Online Bipartite Matching: Two-sided, Group, and Individualcited by 7
- 2023Group fairness in dynamic refugee assignmentcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.