mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Residual Scaling of Looped Transformers: Stability and Transferability

arXiv 2606.18524 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Looped (weight-tied) Transformers apply a shared residual block N times (h leftarrow h + varepsilon,f(h), same f at each step), increasing effective depth without adding parameters. Prior depth-scaling analyses prescribe varepsilon = 1/!√L for depth-L residual networks. We show that this is insufficient for looped architectures: weight sharing makes residual updates correlated across iterations, requiring the stronger scaling varepsilon = 1/N. For multi-layer blocks (L unique layers looped N times), we derive a factored parameterization varepsilon = λ/(N!√L) that separates the two sources of growth: 1/N controls the within-layer loop correlation, and 1/!√L controls the across-layer variance. A key consequence is that the optimal learning rate depends only on the number of unique layers L, not on the loop count N, enabling direct hyperparameter transfer from small to large N without retuning. Experiments on looped Transformers confirm that 1/N scaling improves trainability and yields better loss than 1/!√N scaling across loop counts.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.

Builds on

28 of 36 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  5. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
  6. 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,425
  7. 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,104
  8. 2020On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecturecited by 906
  9. 2018Universal Transformerscited by 613
  10. 2022Tensor Programs V: Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfercited by 272
  11. 2016Using the Output Embedding to Improve Language Modelscited by 266
  12. 2020ReZero is All You Need: Fast Convergence at Large Depthcited by 260
16 more
  1. 2025Reasoning with Latent Thoughts: On the Power of Looped Transformerscited by 223
  2. 2019Fixup Initialization: Residual Learning Without Normalizationcited by 194
  3. 2022DeepNet: Scaling Transformers to 1,000 Layerscited by 176
  4. 2025Scaling Latent Reasoning via Looped Language Modelscited by 145
  5. 2023Looped Transformers are Better at Learning Learning Algorithmscited by 135
  6. 2024Looped Transformers for Length Generalizationcited by 91
  7. 2024Understanding Warmup-Stable-Decay Learning Rates: A River Valley Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 75
  8. 2025Don't be lazy: CompleteP enables compute-efficient deep transformerscited by 69
  9. 2023Depthwise Hyperparameter Transfer in Residual Networks: Dynamics and Scaling Limitcited by 64
  10. 2024Can Looped Transformers Learn to Implement Multi-step Gradient Descent for In-context Learning?cited by 60
  11. 2025Completed Hyperparameter Transfer across Modules, Width, Depth, Batch and Durationcited by 22
  12. 2023Width and Depth Limits Commute in Residual Networkscited by 21
  13. 2023Generalization bounds for neural ordinary differential equations and deep residual networkscited by 21
  14. 2022Scaling ResNets in the Large-depth Regimecited by 18
  15. 2026Training-Free Looped Transformerscited by 12
  16. 2024Loop Neural Networks for Parameter Sharingcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.

7 papers.