Concept Modulation Models: A Unified Framework for Identifiability and Extrapolation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reliable generalization in conditional latent variable models requires understanding both identifiability and extrapolation: how observed variation across attributes determines latent structure, and how that structure determines distributions at unseen attributes. However, existing identifiability and extrapolation guarantees are largely model-specific, with separate analyses in nonlinear ICA, causal representation learning, perturbation modeling, and related conditional latent variable models. We introduce concept modulation models (CMMs), an attribute-indexed class of conditional generative models with structure A→ Lambda → C→ X, where attributes select modulators, modulators induce latent concept laws, and concepts generate observed features. CMMs lift transition-based identifiability to conditional settings by showing that feature agreement on observed attributes induces a latent concept transition constrained by the CMM class. We express these constraints through attribute potentials, log-density ratios between attribute-conditioned concept laws, separating the generic lifting step from model-specific rigidity arguments. The same potentials control extrapolation: agreement at unseen attributes holds exactly when the transported attribute-potential identities extend to those attributes. This yields algebraic extrapolation criteria, identifies the common potential-based proof objects behind several existing identifiability and extrapolation results, and, when combined with the model-specific rigidity arguments in those works, recovers their stated conclusions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.
Builds on
38 of 54 references.
References · 38
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
- 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 503
- 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 496
- 2023Label-Free Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 285
- 2018Nonlinear ICA Using Auxiliary Variables and Generalized Contrastive Learningcited by 282
- 2021Disentanglement via Mechanism Sparsity Regularization: A New Principle for Nonlinear ICAcited by 160
- 2022Interventional Causal Representation Learningcited by 142
- 2022Weakly supervised causal representation learningcited by 140
- 2022CITRIS: Causal Identifiability from Temporal Intervened Sequencescited by 133
- 2023Nonparametric Identifiability of Causal Representations from Unknown Interventionscited by 106
26 more
- 2020ICE-BeeM: Identifiable Conditional Energy-Based Deep Models Based on Nonlinear ICAcited by 102
- 2023Learning Linear Causal Representations from Interventions under General Nonlinear Mixingcited by 92
- 2022Linear Causal Disentanglement via Interventionscited by 84
- 2023Identifiability Guarantees for Causal Disentanglement from Soft Interventionscited by 84
- 2023Multi-View Causal Representation Learning with Partial Observabilitycited by 74
- 2024Causal Representation Learning from Multiple Distributions: A General Settingcited by 68
- 2022Weakly Supervised Representation Learning with Sparse Perturbationscited by 65
- 2023Additive Decoders for Latent Variables Identification and Cartesian-Product Extrapolationcited by 58
- 2023Interpretable Neural-Symbolic Concept Reasoningcited by 57
- 2023BISCUIT: Causal Representation Learning from Binary Interactionscited by 38
- 2024A Sparsity Principle for Partially Observable Causal Representation Learningcited by 35
- 2023General Identifiability and Achievability for Causal Representation Learningcited by 34
- 2024Unifying Causal Representation Learning with the Invariance Principlecited by 31
- 2021Properties from Mechanisms: An Equivariance Perspective on Identifiable Representation Learningcited by 30
- 2024Score-based Causal Representation Learning: Linear and General Transformationscited by 27
- 2022Deep Symbolic Learning: Discovering Symbols and Rules from Perceptionscited by 21
- 2023Identifying Representations for Intervention Extrapolationcited by 21
- 2024Identifiable Exchangeable Mechanisms for Causal Structure and Representation Learningcited by 16
- 2016Anchor-Free Correlated Topic Modeling: Identifiability and Algorithmcited by 15
- 2024Linear Causal Representation Learning from Unknown Multi-node Interventionscited by 14
- 2025On the Limits of Sparse Autoencoders: A Theoretical Framework and Reweighted Remedycited by 14
- 2023Synthetic Combinations: A Causal Inference Framework for Combinatorial Interventionscited by 12
- 2023Intervention Generalization: A View from Factor Graph Modelscited by 7
- 2025Nonparametric Identification of Latent Conceptscited by 3
- 2025Equivariance by Contrast: Identifiable Equivariant Embeddings from Unlabeled Finite Group Actionscited by 2
- 2026A Unifying Framework for Unsupervised Concept Extractioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.