Unintended Effects of Geographic Conditioning in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern conversational AI systems frequently rely on user metadata to localize responses, yet the unintended regional biases introduced by this hidden context remain poorly understood. In this work, we evaluate location leakage: the phenomenon where a model generates geographic references despite receiving a geographically neutral user prompt. Across both creative writing and open-ended Q&A prompts, even state-of-the-art LLMs systematically favor region-specific outputs when exposed to location metadata, with leakage spiking by up to 793 times above baseline (e.g., from 0.04% to 31.7% for Llama 3.1-8B, and 21.3% and 8.8% for Qwen3-8B and Claude Sonnet 4.6, respectively). Our analysis further shows a novel structural conditioning effect: replacing the injected location with the placeholder "Unknown" still elevates leakage by up to 72 times above baseline, demonstrating that the user profile frame itself, independent of any geographic content, acts as a generative conditioning signal.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.
Builds on
8 of 16 references.
References · 8
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
- 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
- 2020CrowS-Pairs: A Challenge Dataset for Measuring Social Biases in Masked Language Modelscited by 703
- 2024Large Language Models are Geographically Biasedcited by 91
- 2024Implicit Personalization in Language Models: A Systematic Studycited by 18
- 2025Geopolitical biases in LLMs: what are the "good" and the "bad" countries according to contemporary language modelscited by 5
- 2026Regional Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.