Non-negative Elastic Net Decoding for Information Retrieval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dense retrieval has become the dominant paradigm in information retrieval, in which each document is scored against a query by the inner product of their vector embeddings, and the top-k documents by score are retrieved for this query. However, since each document's score depends solely on the embedding of the query and itself, the retrieval process is oblivious to the content of the entire corpus. Therefore, dense retrieval cannot avoid selecting semantically similar documents from the corpus, which may result in a non-diverse, redundant set of retrieved documents. To this end, we approach retrieval as a joint decoding problem, in which documents are selected as a set with regard to the context of the rest of the corpus. To achieve this, we propose Non-Negative elastic Net (NNN) decoding, which selects documents whose embeddings jointly reconstruct the query embedding as a sparse non-negative linear combination. Our main theoretical result establishes a strict separation between dense retrieval and NNN decoding. For any corpus, every query correctly handled by dense retrieval is also handled by NNN decoding, while on corpora containing correlated documents, NNN decoding additionally handles queries that dense retrieval cannot. Experimental results indicate that applying NNN decoding to frozen embeddings trained for inner-product scoring yields consistent improvements across several benchmarks. Moreover, we introduce an end-to-end training procedure which optimizes the embeddings for NNN decoding, producing significant performance gains surpassing in all metrics and benchmarks compared to dense retrieval. Our work establishes a new paradigm for leveraging dense embeddings in information retrieval, beyond the standard practice of inner-product scoring.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.
Builds on
31 of 53 references.
References · 31
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,141
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,947
- 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,332
- 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,293
- 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,253
- 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,216
- 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,178
- 2016Efficient and robust approximate nearest neighbor search using Hierarchical Navigable Small World graphscited by 861
19 more
- 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 849
- 2019Passage Re-ranking with BERTcited by 645
- 2021Sentence-T5: Scalable Sentence Encoders from Pre-trained Text-to-Text Modelscited by 463
- 2023Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agentscited by 360
- 2022One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddingscited by 333
- 2024MultiHop-RAG: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multi-Hop Queriescited by 257
- 2024Generative Representational Instruction Tuningcited by 233
- 2025On the Theoretical Limitations of Embedding-Based Retrievalcited by 104
- 2025Gemini Embedding: Generalizable Embeddings from Geminicited by 94
- 2023Learning to Rank in Generative Retrievalcited by 46
- 2024Towards Completeness-Oriented Tool Retrieval for Large Language Modelscited by 26
- 2024Efficient and Scalable Estimation of Tool Representations in Vector Spacecited by 22
- 2023GLEN: Generative Retrieval via Lexical Index Learningcited by 17
- 2025Vendi-RAG: Adaptively Trading-Off Diversity And Quality Significantly Improves Retrieval Augmented Generation With LLMscited by 14
- 2023Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Reranking with Large Language Models for Low-Resource Languagescited by 8
- 2023Average case analysis of Lasso under ultra-sparse conditionscited by 5
- 2025Global Minimizers of Sigmoid Contrastive Losscited by 5
- 2026What Limits Does Quantization Place on Dense Top-k Retrieval? A Theoretical Studycited by 4
- 2026Is Dimensionality a Barrier for Retrieval Models?cited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.