On Response-Adaptive Targeting Strategies for Multi-Treatment Experiments
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Response-adaptive randomization (RAR) in clinical trials aims to improve ethical and statistical efficiency by dynamically allocating patients to treatments based on observed outcomes. While RAR based on a target optimal allocation have been extensively studied for two-arms settings, their extension to multi-treatment experiments (K ≥ 2) remains theoretically fragmented, with most existing methods focusing on specific algorithms or restricted target allocations. In this paper, we introduce a unified framework for response-adaptive targeting, the α-Rebalancing Targeting Strategies (αRTS), which generalize the ERADE two-armed strategy of Hu et al. [2009]. We prove that all designs in this family share fundamental asymptotic properties: strong consistency, asymptotic normality of allocation proportions and treatment effect estimators, and asymptotic efficiency. To address sparse target regimes (where some treatments are asymptotically eliminated), we further propose αRTS with Forced Exploration, a variant that guarantees infinite sampling for all treatments while preserving the asymptotic guarantees. Extensive simulations illustrate the finite-sample behavior of αRTS variants in a 3-armed context, highlighting in particular the critical role of forced exploration in sparse settings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.
Builds on
2 of 24 references.
References · 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.