mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

When Dynamics Models Read the Wrong Time Steps: Label-Free Event Credit Re-Anchoring for Robust Global Readouts

arXiv 2606.17572 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learned dynamics models often answer global physical questions, such as fault severity or impact stiffness, by pooling a per-step feature sequence into one readout vector. This sequence-to-global interface creates an under-studied temporal credit problem: with only trajectory-level supervision, a model can predict accurately in training conditions while reading from abundant smooth correlates rather than the brief physical events that determine the target. We call this failure temporal credit dilution. It is not exposed by the training loss and is not removed by standard physics-informed residuals, because the error lies in where the global readout assigns functional credit. We introduce Credit-in-Event, an interface-level probe for measuring how much pooled credit lands on event steps, and prove in closed form that a pooled linear reader routes credit to a spurious background channel as the event fraction shrinks. We then propose CREST, a training-free and label-free readout that estimates a transient event core from learned features and re-anchors the pooled representation through event-versus-rest contrast. Across simulated gear and impact systems, recurrent and attention encoders, and public bearing vibration data, CREST reduces out-of-distribution error while restoring event credit. Ablations show that stable-step selection and receptive-field shrinking fail, confirming that the gain comes from event-core credit re-anchoring rather than a generic locality or stability prior.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.

Builds on

12 of 18 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  4. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
  5. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
  6. 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,095
  7. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
  8. 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 871
  9. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 636
  10. 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 381
  11. 2020Learning from Failure: Training Debiased Classifier from Biased Classifiercited by 133
  12. 2026Vision Transformers Need More Than Registerscited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.