Amortized Probabilistic Retrieval of Atmospheric CO2 from OCO-2 Spectra Using Deep Learning with Laplace Approximations and Normalizing Flows
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Space-based monitoring of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) constrains the global carbon budget. NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) estimates column-averaged dry-air mole fractions of CO2 (XCO2) from high-resolution spectra, but operational retrievals are computationally expensive and impose stringent Gaussianity assumptions on the retrieved posterior. We present a deep learning framework that addresses both through amortized probabilistic inference. Lacking ground truth for real observations, we train and evaluate on a high-fidelity OCO-2 simulation ensemble with calibrated forward-model errors, comparing against the version-10 ACOS full-physics retrieval on the same radiances. Our architecture encodes each spectral band separately and estimates posteriors of the full CO2 column, or summaries thereof, with Laplace approximations and conditional normalizing flows. Once trained, inference costs milliseconds per sounding rather than minutes, and calibrated posteriors are attainable at that cost. Trained on simulations that explicitly include forward-model discrepancy, our retrievals are more accurate than the operational one for XCO2 on both data partitions we consider, and competitive on profiles. The flow represents asymmetric posteriors that a Gaussian cannot, a gain attributable to shape rather than scale, and its advantage in predictive density persists where its accuracy advantage does not. These results are established on a land-only ensemble against one configuration of the operational algorithm. On reference soundings withheld from training and on two unseen months the XCO2 and density advantages persist while calibration degrades under sparsely sampled observing conditions, pointing to the diversity of the simulated scene population rather than the method as the main obstacle.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.
Builds on
16 of 75 references.
References · 16
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,313
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
- 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
- 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 590
- 2021Attention Bottlenecks for Multimodal Fusioncited by 361
- 2021Laplace Redux -- Effortless Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 359
- 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 240
- 2021Delving into Deep Imbalanced Regressioncited by 157
4 more
- 2016Entity Embeddings of Categorical Variablescited by 85
- 2021Detecting Model Misspecification in Amortized Bayesian Inference with Neural Networkscited by 48
- 2020Peeking inside the Black Box: Interpreting Deep Learning Models for Exoplanet Atmospheric Retrievalscited by 9
- 2025Conditional Diffusion-Based Retrieval of Atmospheric CO2 from Earth Observing Spectroscopycited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.