Decoupling Inference from State Updates in Low-Latency Feature Engines via Probabilistic Thinning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Streaming data systems increasingly underpin Machine Learning workflows that maintain large numbers of continuously updated aggregations. In production settings, each incoming event typically triggers read-modify-write operations to persistent storage, making high-frequency state updates a dominant source of latency, contention, and operational cost. In this work, we decouple inference from state persistence in streaming Machine Learning pipelines via probabilistic thinning: every event is scored, but durable state updates are selectively triggered by informative events. Unlike approaches that shed input or state, we show that persistence-path control is achievable without a high-frequency in-memory control plane or cross-worker coordination, relying exclusively on approximate statistics retrieved from disk-backed key-value stores. We model the resulting stochastic processes, derive bounds on filtering rates, and prove that common time-based aggregations remain unbiased under variance-aware formulations, preventing systemic error accumulation. We evaluate the approach in a controlled setting that isolates per-event costs, demonstrating substantial reductions in storage Input/Output and serialization overhead. Across experiments, up to 90% of events are excluded from the persistence path while preserving and in some cases improving downstream utility.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2026.
Builds on
6 of 72 references.
References · 6
- 2016Zoneout: Regularizing RNNs by Randomly Preserving Hidden Activationscited by 54
- 2019Synthesizing Credit Card Transactionscited by 10
- 2017Adaptive Threshold Samplingcited by 2
- 2017Stream Aggregation Through Order Samplingcited by 1
- 2021Railgun: managing large streaming windows under MAD requirementscited by 1
- 2024Locally Differentially Private Embedding Models in Distributed Fraud Prevention Systemscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.