mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explainable Flood Segmentation on Sentinel-1 SAR1 Imagery Using CNN and Transformer Architectures

arXiv 2606.16302 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Rapid and accurate flood prediction is essential for disaster response and mitigation planning. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) sensors in satellites are well-suited for this purpose because they operate independently of weather and daylight conditions. Although SAR-based data enable all-weather flood monitoring, distinguishing flooded land from permanent water remains a significant challenge, particularly when flooding is defined strictly as inundated land. This study provides a comprehensive comparison of convolutional neural network (CNN) and vision transformer architectures for multi-class flood segmentation using Sentinel-1 SAR imagery, specifically trained to separate flooded land from permanent water bodies and land. Three state-of-the-art (SOTA)CNN-based models, U-Net, U-Net++, and DeepLabV3 with ResNet-34 backbone, and three SegFormer variants (b0,b1,b2) were evaluated in two benchmark datasets, the ETCI NASA dataset and SenFloods11, using scene-based data splits to ensure a realistic assessment of spatial generalization. The results demonstrate that SegFormer-b2 significantly outperforms the U-Net baseline on the ETCI dataset (higher flood IoU across all 7 test scenes in the Wilcoxon signed-rank test), while after fine-tuning on Sen1Floods11, the advantage narrows to within the range of scene variability and is concentrated in spatially fragmented flood events. The study includes both qualitative and quantitative explainability techniques to visually comprehend model decisions and systematically assess prediction reliability. Qualitative analysis reveals that SegFormer-b2 produces more spatially coherent Grad-CAM activations focused on flood-relevant features, while U-Net generates more informative uncertainty estimates along flood boundaries.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2026.

Builds on

17 of 63 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  4. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
  5. 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,940
  6. 2018UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,525
  7. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
  8. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 321
  9. 2018Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networkscited by 280
  10. 2022Contextual Attention Network: Transformer Meets U-Netcited by 33
  11. 2022ConvFormer: Combining CNN and Transformer for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 10
  12. 2021Flood Segmentation on Sentinel-1 SAR Imagery with Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 8
5 more
  1. 2024Mapping Global Floods with 10 Years of Satellite Radar Datacited by 8
  2. 2024Improving Interpretability of Deep Active Learning for Flood Inundation Mapping Through Class Ambiguity Indices Using Multi-spectral Satellite Imagerycited by 6
  3. 2025We Care Each Pixel: Calibrating on Medical Segmentation Modelcited by 2
  4. 2025Adversarial Robustness of Deep Learning Models for Inland Water Body Segmentation from SAR Imagescited by 2
  5. 2025Towards Reliable WMH Segmentation under Domain Shift: An Application Study using Maximum Entropy Regularization to Improve Uncertainty Estimationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.