mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Amortized quadrature for posterior expectations in inverse problems

arXiv 2606.15871 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2026stat.CO cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Uncertainty in the solution of an inverse problem and in the tasks performed on it is quantified by posterior expectations, each an average of an integrand over M posterior samples. While designed quadratures improve on the O(M-1/2) error of Monte-Carlo estimation, they solve an optimization problem, often against the posterior density, for every new observation, which can be computationally costly. To address this limitation, we introduce the quadrature field, a set-equivariant network that maps an observation and its M posterior samples to an M-node signed-weight quadrature in one forward pass. Trained once on a family of posteriors to minimize the worst-case integration error over a class of functions, it serves any observation, any M and any integrand in that class with no further optimization. We show that, with high probability and up to a computable slack, the resulting quadrature is never worse than the Monte-Carlo estimate built from the same samples. We validate the quadrature field on closed-form and on learned posteriors, one constrained by a partial differential equation, where it improves on the Monte-Carlo estimate in median at every node count, often by orders of magnitude.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2026.

Builds on

27 of 42 references.

References · 27

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Deep Setscited by 1,394
  3. 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 490
  4. 2019Automatic Posterior Transformation for Likelihood-Free Inferencecited by 216
  5. 2020BayesFlow: Learning complex stochastic models with invertible neural networkscited by 139
  6. 2014Control functionals for Monte Carlo integrationcited by 59
  7. 2021Kernel Thinningcited by 47
  8. 2018Stein Pointscited by 43
  9. 2020Conditional Sampling with Monotone GANs: from Generative Models to Likelihood-Free Inferencecited by 40
  10. 2016Support pointscited by 39
  11. 2023Conditional score-based diffusion models for Bayesian inference in infinite dimensionscited by 37
  12. 2019HINT: Hierarchical Invertible Neural Transport for Density Estimation and Bayesian Inferencecited by 31
15 more
  1. 2018Near-Optimal Coresets of Kernel Density Estimatescited by 30
  2. 2014Likelihood-informed dimension reduction for nonlinear inverse problemscited by 26
  3. 2015Probabilistic Integration: A Role in Statistical Computation?cited by 26
  4. 2018Certified dimension reduction in nonlinear Bayesian inverse problemscited by 26
  5. 2020Optimal Thinning of MCMC Outputcited by 25
  6. 2021Positively Weighted Kernel Quadrature via Subsamplingcited by 25
  7. 2022Reliable amortized variational inference with physics-based latent distribution correctioncited by 25
  8. 2021Distribution Compression in Near-linear Timecited by 19
  9. 2018Bayesian Quadrature for Multiple Related Integralscited by 15
  10. 2023Efficient Numerical Integration in Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces via Leverage Scores Samplingcited by 10
  11. 2025Weighted quantization using MMD: From mean field to mean shift via gradient flowscited by 10
  12. 2023Meta-learning Control Variates: Variance Reduction with Limited Datacited by 6
  13. 2019Amortized Monte Carlo Integrationcited by 2
  14. 2026Conditional neural control variates for variance reduction in Bayesian inverse problemscited by 2
  15. 2026To discretize continually: Mean shift interacting particle systems for Bayesian inferencecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.