Learning to Orchestrate Vision Foundation Models for Multi-Task Dense Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision foundation models (VFMs) exhibit complementary strengths shaped by their pretraining objectives. Yet prevailing methods for multi-task dense prediction still train an entire backbone, either by fine-tuning it under multi-task supervision or by distilling multiple VFMs in an additional stage. We ask whether downstream learning can instead compose the frozen representations already available in foundation models. Dense tasks require composite representations that no individual expert provides alone. Realizing them is difficult: simple fusion yields only marginal gains over the best single expert, while learned routing tends to collapse toward candidates that are strong at initialization, starving newly initialized composers of training signal. We present COVE, which constructs pairwise composite candidates through Synergy Composers and routes among raw and composite candidates with a Task-Conditioned Router. To prevent this collapse, COVE combines Gaussian logit perturbation for exploration with counterfactual supervision that selectively increases under-credited routing allocations. On NYUD-v2 and PASCAL-Context, COVE matches or surpasses ViT-L-based methods on most tasks using a smaller frozen encoder pool and roughly half the computation of recent VFM-based competitors, while exceeding the best single frozen expert on every task.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2026.
Builds on
19 of 29 references.
References · 19
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
- 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
- 2018PAD-Net: Multi-Tasks Guided Prediction-and-Distillation Network for Simultaneous Depth Estimation and Scene Parsingcited by 224
- 2023AM-RADIO: Agglomerative Vision Foundation Model -- Reduce All Domains Into Onecited by 165
- 2022CroCo: Self-Supervised Pre-training for 3D Vision Tasks by Cross-View Completioncited by 158
- 2022On the Representation Collapse of Sparse Mixture of Expertscited by 156
- 2022InvPT: Inverted Pyramid Multi-task Transformer for Dense Scene Understandingcited by 89
- 2024MoVA: Adapting Mixture of Vision Experts to Multimodal Contextcited by 82
7 more
- 2024Multi-Task Dense Prediction via Mixture of Low-Rank Expertscited by 58
- 2023TaskExpert: Dynamically Assembling Multi-Task Representations with Memorial Mixture-of-Expertscited by 45
- 2023InvPT++: Inverted Pyramid Multi-Task Transformer for Visual Scene Understandingcited by 22
- 2024Routers in Vision Mixture of Experts: An Empirical Studycited by 22
- 2023TSP-Transformer: Task-Specific Prompts Boosted Transformer for Holistic Scene Understandingcited by 12
- 2023Multi-task Learning with 3D-Aware Regularizationcited by 8
- 2026When Are Experts Misrouted? Counterfactual Routing Analysis in Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelscited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.