Perfect Demo Makes Poor Teacher: Learning Robust Alignment from Critical Motion Segments
On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Robot manipulation imitation learning
Abstract (arXiv)
Expert demonstrations are widely assumed to be the gold standard for robot imitation learning. Yet for fine-grained manipulation such as insertion, stacking, and alignment, we uncover a counterintuitive failure mode: fluent demonstrations can be poor teachers. A skilled teleoperator compresses the decisive moments of alignment and recovery into a brief temporal window, leaving the policy flooded with redundant free-space motion and starved of supervision exactly where precision determines success. We address this bottleneck at two levels. At the data level, slowing down near alignment and resampling critical segments both help, yet the gain comes mainly from broadening the coverage of recovery states the policy must learn, not from reweighting frames it already has. Such data-side fixes, however, leave the policy's per-frame view untouched: a single image still maps directly to an action, and the local motion that governs correction stays implicit. We therefore turn to the representation level and introduce STAIR (Spatio-Temporal feature As an Interface for Robot learning), a compact dynamic feature that bridges the vision-language model and the action expert, distilling the short-horizon motion already recorded in each trajectory into dense, motion-aware supervision. Trained on fluent data alone, STAIR recovers most of the deliberate-demonstration gain (50.0 to 62.2% overall, approaching the 64.4% of deliberate demonstrations). These results call for a more pedagogical view of robot data, optimized for machine learnability rather than human efficiency alone.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Robot manipulation imitation learning, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Imitation Learning from a Single Temporally Misaligned Video
- 2021Coarse-to-Fine Imitation Learning: Robot Manipulation from a Single Demonstration
- 2026It's Not Just More Demos: Counterfactual Action Sensitivity Coverage for Data-Efficient Robust Robot Imitation
- 2026CORE: Common Outcome Regularities from Action-Free Visual Demonstrations for Robot Manipulation
- 2024Learning from 10 Demos: Generalisable and Sample-Efficient Policy Learning with Oriented Affordance Frames
- 2023On the Effectiveness of Retrieval, Alignment, and Replay in Manipulation
- 2024VITAL: Interactive Few-Shot Imitation Learning via Visual Human-in-the-Loop Corrections
- 2021Ergodic imitation: Learning from what to do and what not to do