Identification and Inference for Algorithmic Frontiers with Selective Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper provides identification results to characterize a fairness-accuracy (FA) frontier, and statistical inference tools to test hypotheses and build a confidence set for the FA-frontier, when outcomes are observed only for selected individuals. When the selection process is unrestricted but loss is measured in specific ways, we provide a characterization of the sharp identification region of the FA-frontier. When the observed distribution rules out frontier membership for a binary status quo algorithm, we construct a single alternative algorithm that improves both groups' accuracy without worsening fairness, uniformly over all admissible distributions of missing labels. For any loss functions, under selection on observables and strict overlap assumptions, we obtain point identification and propose a debiased machine learning estimator, derive its asymptotic distribution, and show how this can be used to carry out inference for the FA-frontier.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2026.
Builds on
8 of 57 references.
References · 8
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 586
- 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 148
- 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 141
- 2022To the Fairness Frontier and Beyond: Identifying, Quantifying, and Optimizing the Fairness-Accuracy Pareto Frontiercited by 11
- 2022Robust Design and Evaluation of Predictive Algorithms under Unobserved Confoundingcited by 8
- 2025The Statistical Fairness-Accuracy Frontiercited by 3
- 2024Inference for an Algorithmic Fairness-Accuracy Frontiercited by 2
- 2024Testing the Fairness-Accuracy Improvability of Algorithmscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.