Pre-Training for Simulation-Based Science: A Study on Jet Foundation Model Training Objectives
On the map: Diffusion models → Flow matching, time series and science
Abstract (arXiv)
Foundation models (FMs) trained on large datasets and fine-tuned on downstream tasks have emerged as a powerful paradigm in AI for science. Industrial FMs are typically trained using self-supervision with masking due to the lack of labels. In many scientific domains, accurate simulations are plentiful and facilitate large, labeled datasets. This opens up new possibilities for pre-training. We present a systematic comparison of pre-training methods using the OmniLearned High Energy Physics FM framework. We test supervised classification, flow-matching generation, and self-supervised masked particle modeling. All models are pre-trained on the JetClass dataset and fine-tuned on two representative downstream tasks, top jet classification and JetNet conditional generation. Among other observations, for classification tasks, we find that pure classifier pre-training is optimal when downstream labels and model capacity are plentiful, but combining it with self-supervised masked particle modeling (MPM) is uniquely powerful in the low-finetuning label regime. Flow matching-based generative pre-training seems to provide little benefit for downstream classification, and interestingly, for downstream generation, we find that flow matching must be in the pre-training objective to see a significant finetuning advantage, hinting at the orthogonality of classification and generation tasks. That is, for a model to transfer to both generative and classification downstream tasks, it must be pre-trained on both. This study provides a template for controlled scaling analysis of pre-training objectives for foundation models in simulation-based sciences.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Flow matching, time series and science, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 7 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2026.
Builds on
7 of 20 references.
References · 7
- 2025UMA: A Family of Universal Models for Atomscited by 102
- 2025Walrus: A Cross-Domain Foundation Model for Continuum Dynamicscited by 29
- 2026Neural Scaling Laws for Boosted Jet Taggingcited by 12
- 2025HEP-JEPA: A foundation model for collider physics using joint embedding predictive architecturecited by 11
- 2026Neural Scaling Laws for Jet Generationcited by 4
- 2026Zatom-1: Towards a Multimodal Foundation Model for 3D Molecules and Materialscited by 3
- 2026Cross-Domain Transfer with Particle Physics Foundation Models: From Jets to Neutrino Interactionscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Masked Particle Modeling on Sets: Towards Self-Supervised High Energy Physics Foundation Models
- 2023Flow Matching Beyond Kinematics: Generating Jets with Particle-ID and Trajectory Displacement Information
- 2026Panda Diplomacy: Foundation Model Pre-training across Particle Imaging Detectors for High Energy and Nuclear Physics
- 2025Shortcutting Pre-trained Flow Matching Diffusion Models is Almost Free Lunch
- 2025Physics vs Distributions: Pareto Optimal Flow Matching with Physics Constraints
- 2025Even Faster Simulations with Flow Matching: A Study of Zero Degree Calorimeter Responses
- 2025Towards a Foundation Model for Partial Differential Equations Across Physics Domains
- 2026Conditional Capacity and Routing in Mixture-of-Experts Particle Transformers