Which Directions Matter? Sparse Design for Affine Robust Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Robust machine learning and optimization rely on the uncertainty model choice. We investigate which uncertainty directions a model must cover when defined by a finite dictionary and a budget constraint. Selecting a subset forms an atomic uncertainty set with a closed form support function, yielding tractable robust programs for affine objectives. We propose a data driven selection rule based on a coverage objective over evaluation directions, including gradients, adversarial perturbations, or shifts observed on held out data. We prove this objective is monotone and submodular, supporting a greedy method with a (1-1/e) approximation guarantee and a matching hardness barrier. We also provide a certificate bounding the loss from the selected subset and a radius calibration rule with out of sample control.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2026.
Builds on
13 of 34 references.
References · 13
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
- 2016Distribution-Free Predictive Inference For Regressioncited by 668
- 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 629
- 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 567
- 2017Certifying Some Distributional Robustness with Principled Adversarial Trainingcited by 337
- 2018Certified Defenses against Adversarial Examplescited by 306
- 2017Exploring the Landscape of Spatial Robustnesscited by 81
- 2022Optimal Scenario Reduction for One- and Two-Stage Robust Optimizationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.