mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DIFF-ERO: A Conformance-Aware Loss for Deep Learning in Process Mining

arXiv 2606.14283 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning has driven many recent advances in process analytics, especially for predictive and prescriptive monitoring. However, standard objectives such as cross-entropy optimize local next-step likelihoods and only implicitly capture control-flow structure. As a result, models can achieve high token-level accuracy while permitting imprecise global behaviour. We introduce DIFF-ERO, a conformance-aware loss function for deep learning models on process data. DIFF-ERO is a differentiable formulation of entropy-based stochastic conformance that incorporates control-flow information during training. Our approach constructs batch-level stochastic transition matrices with soft edge memberships, allowing structural precision and recall signals to directly inform backpropagation. The loss is model-agnostic and can be applied whenever the final representation parametrizes stochastic transitions. We instantiate DIFF-ERO in transformer encoder-decoder pipelines for next-activity prediction and use it jointly with cross-entropy to analyse its theoretical components with respect to convergence. Across benchmarks comparing other loss functions and targets, DIFF-ERO shows improved predictive performance where structure matters most while maintaining parity elsewhere. At the same time, the learned stochastic automaton converges towards the structural ground truth, indicating that the network internalizes process model structure.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2026.

Builds on

20 of 33 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Soft-DTW: a Differentiable Loss Function for Time-Seriescited by 271
  2. 2018Learning Latent Permutations with Gumbel-Sinkhorn Networkscited by 175
  3. 2022Calibrating Sequence likelihood Improves Conditional Language Generationcited by 121
  4. 2016Predictive Business Process Monitoring with LSTM Neural Networkscited by 104
  5. 2020Gradient Estimation with Stochastic Softmax Trickscited by 67
  6. 2017Classical Structured Prediction Losses for Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 55
  7. 2023Loss Functions and Metrics in Deep Learningcited by 42
  8. 2021Creating Unbiased Public Benchmark Datasets with Data Leakage Prevention for Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 16
  9. 2018Deep Structured Prediction with Nonlinear Output Transformationscited by 12
  10. 2021Process Discovery Using Graph Neural Networkscited by 7
  11. 2025Neuro-Symbolic Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 7
  12. 2020An Entropic Relevance Measure for Stochastic Conformance Checking in Process Miningcited by 6
8 more
  1. 2024Conformance Checking of Fuzzy Logs against Declarative Temporal Specificationscited by 5
  2. 2023Knowledge-Driven Modulation of Neural Networks with Attention Mechanism for Next Activity Predictioncited by 4
  3. 2024Generating Feasible and Plausible Counterfactual Explanations for Outcome Prediction of Business Processescited by 4
  4. 2022Can recurrent neural networks learn process model structure?cited by 3
  5. 2024Guiding the generation of counterfactual explanations through temporal background knowledge for Predictive Process Monitoringcited by 3
  6. 2025Directly Follows Graphs Go Predictive Process Monitoring With Graph Neural Networkscited by 3
  7. 2024Attention Please: What Transformer Models Really Learn for Process Predictioncited by 2
  8. 2025ProCause: Generating Counterfactual Outcomes to Evaluate Prescriptive Process Monitoring Methodscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.