mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluating LLMs for Obfuscation Detection and Classification in Android Apps

arXiv 2606.14233 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2026cs.SE cs.CRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Android applications (apps) developers increasingly rely on code obfuscation techniques to hinder reverse engineering and protect intellectual property. However, obfuscation also reduces the effectiveness of static analysis and vulnerability detection tools, creating challenges for Android security analysis. Existing approaches for detecting obfuscation in Android apps predominantly rely on handcrafted heuristics, engineered features, or task-specific learning pipelines, which may struggle to generalize across evolving obfuscation strategies. This paper presents a large-scale empirical study investigating the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to detect obfuscation in Android apps through semantic reasoning. Our study evaluates whether off-the-shelf LLMs can identify obfuscated code without relying on handcrafted rules, predefined signatures, or dedicated model training. The empirical evaluation is conducted on both a controlled benchmark containing an app obfuscated with multiple techniques and a real-world dataset of Android apps collected from Google Play. The study further examines the impact of prompt design, model selection, and decision thresholds across several open-weight and proprietary LLMs. Finally, the analysis compares LLM-based reasoning with existing SAST-based obfuscation-detection approaches and discusses the broader implications and limitations of applying LLMs to Android security analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Assessing the Effectiveness of LLMs in Android Application Vulnerability Analysis
  2. 2025LAMD: Context-driven Android Malware Detection and Classification with LLMs
  3. 2026Towards LLM-Enhanced Android Taint Analysis ↗
  4. 2025A Systematic Study of Code Obfuscation Against LLM-based Vulnerability Detection
  5. 2025"Digital Camouflage": The LLVM Challenge in LLM-Based Malware Detection
  6. 2025LELANTE: LEveraging LLM for Automated ANdroid TEsting ↗
  7. 2026Acoda: Adversarial Code Obfuscation for Defending against LLM-based Analysis
  8. 2024Software Vulnerability and Functionality Assessment using LLMs