Robin-Neumann Coupling of PINN and FEM Solvers: A Steklov-Poincar'e View, with Application to Fluid-Structure Interaction with Contact
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are meshless and carry moving geometry and topology change through resampling of collocation points; the finite-element method (FEM) is the workhorse for boundary-fitted discretisations. Coupling the two across a shared interface promises the best of both, yet existing PINN-FEM schemes are validated only empirically. We put the coupling on a domain-decomposition footing: viewing each solver as a Steklov-Poincar'e (trace-to-flux) operator, we transfer the classical Dirichlet-Neumann (DN) divergence diagnosis and its Robin-Neumann (RN) cure, including a closed-form, sweep-free interface impedance, and prove a PINN-specific contraction theorem: a trained network realises only a perturbed Steklov operator with a per-step training residual, and RN still contracts, with no shared-eigenbasis hypothesis, to a floor set by the achieved training loss. Because a PINN has no stiffness matrix, we introduce a Fourier-mode interface probe that recovers the network's resolvable Steklov eigenvalues to within 0.5% and doubles as a diagnostic of the network's spectral cap. The theory predicts measured PINN-FEM contraction rates to within 7% on 1D and 2D Poisson couplings, and a two-slab analogue of the large-added-mass regime shows RN's per-mode impedance matching winning decisively where tuned scalar relaxation saturates. We demonstrate the framework on a Stokes/rigid-disc problem with Alart-Curnier contact: the meshless PINN fluid absorbs the topology change at contact by collocation exclusion alone, no remeshing and no cut cells, and the static-equilibrium contact reaction matches the submerged weight to 0.4% under mesh refinement. We quantify remaining limitations: the warm-started PINN drifts off the Stokes manifold over long horizons, and matched FEM-FEM benchmarks attribute pre-impact squeeze-film signatures to PINN under-resolution.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2026.
Builds on
12 of 41 references.
References · 12
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,200
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
- 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 619
- 2021Finite Basis Physics-Informed Neural Networks (FBPINNs): a scalable domain decomposition approach for solving differential equationscited by 145
- 2020Local Extreme Learning Machines and Domain Decomposition for Solving Linear and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 81
- 2021Hybrid FEM-NN models: Combining artificial neural networks with the finite element methodcited by 24
- 2022Finite Element Method-enhanced Neural Network for Forward and Inverse Problemscited by 13
- 2023Domain decomposition-based coupling of physics-informed neural networks via the Schwarz alternating methodcited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.