mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hyperdimensional computing for structured querying on tabular data embeddings

arXiv 2606.13871 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2026cs.AI cs.DBcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tabular data embeddings have become a cornerstone of data profiling and data integration pipelines, enabling tasks such as entity annotation and resolution; schema matching; column type detection; and table search, among others. Existing approaches embed rows, columns, or entire tables into a vector space and rely on nearest-neighbor search to retrieve candidate matches. A fundamental limitation of current embedding methods is the lack of interpretable similarity scores: the concrete similarity value between a query and its nearest neighbour carries no intrinsic meaning, making it impossible to determine whether that neighbour is a true match or simply the least-dissimilar item in a corpus that contains no valid answer. This inability to set principled thresholds for retrieval undermines practical deployment, particularly for zero-match detection. We investigate the use of HyperDimensional Computing (HDC), specifically the Holographic Reduced Representations (HRR) model, as a framework for tabular row embeddings when the retrieval task corresponds to answering structured select-project queries in vector space. Exploiting the algebraic properties of HDC operations, we derive closed-form expected similarity values for both equality and non-equality retrieval predicates, which converge to interpretable values as dimensionality increases, and use these to identify suitable retrieval thresholds. We evaluate HDC against EmbDI, a graph-based baseline, on two real-world datasets across varying table sizes and predicate lengths. Our results show that HDC matches or outperforms EmbDI for row retrieval across all configurations, handles non-equality predicates more robustly, and achieves perfect attribute projection accuracy at sufficient dimensionality -- while uniquely enabling reliable identification of zero-match predicates through its principled thresholds.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.

Builds on

11 of 29 references.

References · 11

  1. 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 432
  2. 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 395
  3. 2020Deep Entity Matching with Pre-Trained Language Modelscited by 143
  4. 2021TABBIE: Pretrained Representations of Tabular Datacited by 111
  5. 2021A Survey on Hyperdimensional Computing aka Vector Symbolic Architectures, Part I: Models and Data Transformationscited by 98
  6. 2019Sherlock: A Deep Learning Approach to Semantic Data Type Detectioncited by 73
  7. 2021A Survey on Hyperdimensional Computing aka Vector Symbolic Architectures, Part II: Applications, Cognitive Models, and Challengescited by 68
  8. 2020A Theoretical Perspective on Hyperdimensional Computingcited by 43
  9. 2023HYTREL: Hypergraph-enhanced Tabular Data Representation Learningcited by 35
  10. 2022SANTOS: Relationship-based Semantic Table Union Searchcited by 32
  11. 2025From Features to Structure: Task-Aware Graph Construction for Relational and Tabular Learning with GNNscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.