mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SpheriCity: Designing Trustworthy Conversational AI for Sustainability Decision Support

arXiv 2606.13854 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2026cs.HC cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present SpheriCity, an expert-grounded conversational prototype designed to support trustworthy knowledge sensemaking from sustainability reports. City-level circularity assessment reports contain rich information about materials, infrastructure, and policy interventions, yet their length and heterogeneous structure make cross-document synthesis and comparison difficult for practitioners and researchers working on circular economy initiatives. While large language models (LLM) promise faster knowledge access and synthesis, their opaque reasoning, hallucinations, and lack of source transparency introduce risks for trust and interpretability, and require verification in high-stakes sustainability contexts. SpheriCity addresses these challenges through a provenance-first conversational agent that foregrounds evidence traceability, structured synthesis, and interaction scaffolds to support exploratory querying and cross-document synthesis across sustainability reports. We conducted a formative expert review with six sustainability experts using representative queries spanning cross-city comparison, policy summarization, and recommendation-oriented tasks. Experts evaluated responses across dimensions and provided qualitative reflections on the system's usefulness for sustainability knowledge work. Our results reveal that transparent sourcing, contextual explanation, interpretability, and alignment with expert workflow strongly shape expert trust and judgments of system usefulness. This work contributes (1) a conversational prototype for sustainability knowledge sensemaking, (2) an expert-grounded evaluation framework for assessing AI responses in high-stakes knowledge domains, and (3) design insights into how provenance, uncertainty communication, and integration in workflow influence expert users' trust in AI assistance for sustainability decision support.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.

Builds on

11 of 41 references.

References · 11

  1. 2020USR: An Unsupervised and Reference Free Evaluation Metric for Dialog Generationcited by 188
  2. 2019Survey on Evaluation Methods for Dialogue Systemscited by 126
  3. 2019The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goalscited by 100
  4. 2020Improving Dialog Evaluation with a Multi-reference Adversarial Dataset and Large Scale Pretrainingcited by 59
  5. 2018Towards Exploiting Background Knowledge for Building Conversation Systemscited by 57
  6. 2025Evaluating LLM-based Agents for Multi-Turn Conversations: A Surveycited by 57
  7. 2019What Makes a Good Conversation? Challenges in Designing Truly Conversational Agentscited by 42
  8. 2019Approximating Interactive Human Evaluation with Self-Play for Open-Domain Dialog Systemscited by 42
  9. 2023Foundation Metrics for Evaluating Effectiveness of Healthcare Conversations Powered by Generative AIcited by 32
  10. 2025Is Conversational XAI All You Need? Human-AI Decision Making With a Conversational XAI Assistantcited by 26
  11. 2018Retrieval-Enhanced Adversarial Training for Neural Response Generationcited by 22

Built on by

Not cited yet.