mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Cross-Dataset Bloom Question Classification: Supervised Models and Prompted LLMs

arXiv 2606.13684 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2026cs.CY cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic Bloom's taxonomy classification of assessment questions can substantially reduce instructor workload, but labeling is subjective and teacher-dependent. Prior machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches reported strong within-dataset results, yet were rarely evaluated in cross-dataset settings, leaving real-world generalizability unclear; meanwhile, LLM effectiveness for Bloom question classification has not been systematically studied. We evaluated the cross-dataset generalization of existing ML/DL methods and assessed LLMs with multiple prompting strategies on five datasets; the best prompting strategy combined in-context examples with course-specific action verbs. Supervised ML/DL models degraded substantially on unseen datasets, whereas LLMs were more stable, suggesting a robust alternative across diverse educational contexts. Based on the best prompting strategy, we also presented a lightweight UI that supports instructors in automatically classifying large question banks; a usability study indicated low workload and high usability.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2026.

Builds on

1 of 14 references.

References · 1

  1. 2024Automated Educational Question Generation at Different Bloom's Skill Levels using Large Language Models: Strategies and Evaluationcited by 29

Built on by

Not cited yet.