mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Truncated Positional Encodings for Graph Neural Networks

arXiv 2606.13671 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Positional encodings (PEs) enhance the power of graph neural networks (GNNs), both theoretically and empirically. Two of the most popular families of PEs - spectral (e.g., Laplacian eigenspaces, effective resistance) and walk-based (polynomials of the adjacency matrix) - are theoretically equivalent in expressive power, with expressivity between the 1-WL and 3-WL tests. However, this equivalence assumes the GNN uses the "complete" version of these PEs, which requires O(n3) time and space complexity. Instead, practitioners commonly use truncated variants of these encodings, such as the first k eigenspaces or powers of the adjacency matrix. However, the theoretical properties of these truncated PEs are unknown. In this work, we initiate the study of these truncated PEs. Theoretically, we show that, under truncation, several families of PEs are fundamentally different in expressive power. As a corollary, we show that truncated spectral PEs are no longer stronger than the 1-WL test. We also study a family of spectral PEs, the k-harmonic distances, to highlight the differences in expressive power of even closely related truncated PEs. Finally, we experimentally show that a mix of truncated PEs is preferable to any single family on real-world datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.

Builds on

22 of 47 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  2. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  3. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
  4. 2022Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformercited by 702
  5. 2020Benchmarking Graph Neural Networkscited by 672
  6. 2020On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implicationscited by 624
  7. 2021Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral Attentioncited by 468
  8. 2020A Note on Over-Smoothing for Graph Neural Networkscited by 245
  9. 2022Sign and Basis Invariant Networks for Spectral Graph Representation Learningcited by 176
  10. 2023Graph Inductive Biases in Transformers without Message Passingcited by 150
  11. 2023Rethinking the Expressive Power of GNNs via Graph Biconnectivitycited by 119
  12. 2022A Short Tutorial on The Weisfeiler-Lehman Test And Its Variantscited by 52
10 more
  1. 2023An Empirical Study of Realized GNN Expressivenesscited by 33
  2. 2023On the Stability of Expressive Positional Encodings for Graphscited by 31
  3. 2024Comparing Graph Transformers via Positional Encodingscited by 20
  4. 2022Affinity-Aware Graph Networkscited by 17
  5. 20221-WL Expressiveness Is (Almost) All You Needcited by 15
  6. 2024On the Expressive Power of Spectral Invariant Graph Neural Networkscited by 15
  7. 2020Ultrasparse Ultrasparsifiers and Faster Laplacian System Solverscited by 8
  8. 2017Biharmonic Distance and the Performance of Second-Order Consensus Networks with Stochastic Disturbancescited by 2
  9. 2024Towards Stable, Globally Expressive Graph Representations with Laplacian Eigenvectorscited by 2
  10. 2025Generalizable Insights for Graph Transformers in Theory and Practicecited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.