mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Distribution-Agnostic Robust Trajectory Optimization via Chance-Constrained Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2606.13605 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2026math.OC cs.LG cs.SYcited by 1

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a distribution-agnostic robust trajectory-optimization framework based on chance-constrained reinforcement learning. The uncertainty is represented here through initial conditions and process noise, with the only requirement being that it can be sampled. A deterministic nominal trajectory is first computed offline, and reinforcement learning is then used only to robustify that baseline through a structured affine closed-loop correction law comprising a feedforward control adjustment and time-varying feedback gains. Probabilistic feasibility is enforced empirically through rollout-based upper-tail quantiles, while terminal dispersion is regulated through covariance-feasibility penalties. The framework is assessed on two materially different trajectory design problems. The flagship case study is a three-dimensional multi-impulse Earth-Mars transfer, where the learned policy is benchmarked against a recent robust trajectory-optimization reference under Gaussian uncertainty and then evaluated under bounded uniform uncertainty and under process disturbances not seen during training. The second case study is a stochastic atmospheric pinpoint rocket landing problem, used to assess portability to a short-horizon continuous-thrust setting with drag, mass depletion, and glide-slope constraints. The results show that the proposed framework can remain competitive in upper-tail fuel cost while preserving probabilistic feasibility, and that the same robustification scaffold can be carried across heterogeneous spacecraft trajectory planning problems without redesign of its core stochastic-control structure.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 6 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.

Builds on

6 of 40 references.

References · 6

  1. 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 641
  2. 2020Implementation Matters in Deep Policy Gradients: A Case Study on PPO and TRPOcited by 186
  3. 2017A Rewriting System for Convex Optimization Problemscited by 179
  4. 2014Optimal steering of a linear stochastic system to a final probability distribution, part IIcited by 17
  5. 2020Adaptive Generalized ZEM-ZEV Feedback Guidance for Planetary Landing via a Deep Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 7
  6. 2019Reinforcement Learning for Angle-Only Intercept Guidance of Maneuvering Targetscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Bayesian Deployment Approval for Learned Landing Controllers under Finite Rollout Validation
  2. 2022Distributionally Robust Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Near-Optimal Sample Complexity
  3. 2021Distributionally Robust Surrogate Optimal Control for High-Dimensional Systems
  4. 2026Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Robust Planetary Landing
  5. 2024Sample Complexity of Offline Distributionally Robust Linear Markov Decision Processes
  6. 2025SafeMove-RL: A Certifiable Reinforcement Learning Framework for Dynamic Motion Constraints in Trajectory Planning
  7. 2026Evaluating Robustness and Adaptability in Learning-Based Mission Planning for Active Debris Removal
  8. 2020Reliable Off-policy Evaluation for Reinforcement Learning