RoboProcessBench: Benchmarking Process-Aware Understanding in Vision-Language Robotic Manipulation
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-language models (VLMs) used as robotic critics, reward generators, and failure detectors must understand how manipulation unfolds, not only whether it succeeds. Yet fine-grained process supervision is not readily available in a unified form, and existing evaluations do not systematically diagnose these abilities. We introduce Robo2Process, a trace-grounded framework for scalable construction of process-aware supervision from heterogeneous robotic execution data. It aligns visual observations with source-native signals and annotations, extracts local process units (LPUs), and generates structured QA supervision through task-specific sampling, deterministic label construction, and ambiguity filtering. We instantiate this framework as RoboProcessBench, a diagnostic benchmark with 12 question families spanning static monitoring and dynamic reasoning, and ProcessData, a corpus of 57,892 QA pairs across four data sources and 260 manipulation tasks, split into ProcessData-SFT and ProcessData-Eval. Evaluation of a broad suite of VLMs reveals uneven process understanding. Supervision from ProcessData-SFT improves textitQwen2.5-VL-7B and textitInternVL-3-8B on local state, motion, progress, and primitive-aware cues. External evaluation on RoboRewardBench shows Robo2Process enables out-of-distribution process-aware reasoning abilities. Overall, Robo2Process provides a source-aware pipeline, diagnostic benchmark, and learnable substrate for process-aware understanding in robotic manipulation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025From Seeing to Doing: Bridging Reasoning and Decision for Robotic Manipulation
- 2026RoboIRGBench: Benchmarking Implicit Referential Grounding in Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2026Benchmarking Vision-Language-Action Models on SO-101: Failure and Recovery Analysis
- 2025Experiences from Benchmarking Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotic Manipulation
- 2025ManipBench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Low-Level Robot Manipulation
- 2026Thinking in Text and Images: Interleaved Vision--Language Reasoning Traces for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation
- 2026RoboSemanticBench: Diagnosing Semantic Grounding in Action Prediction for VLA Models
- 2024AHA: A Vision-Language-Model for Detecting and Reasoning Over Failures in Robotic Manipulation