mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Signs Were Always There: Training-Free Concept Detection and Steering in Raw Transformer Dimensions

arXiv 2606.12629 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The standard basis of transformer hidden states is a training-free, architecture-general feature basis for detecting concepts and, in language models, steering them; with no learned dictionary. Individual dimensions act as binary registers read one at a time: their signs (+/-1) encode content, their magnitudes strength. A feature is just a subset of dimensions with a consistent sign pattern, read by counting sign agreements. We validate this Bag of Dims (BoD) framework across seven models spanning language, vision, and audio; reading dimensions one at a time loses nothing, as a full-capacity MLP adds zero AUC over per-dim reading. The same per-dimension signs appear in every modality, so they reflect transformer training itself, not the language objective. Sign alone carries predictive content: setting all magnitudes to unity preserves 60-93% top-5 next-token accuracy through the LM head. From a single-token cache (one forward pass per token, no labels) we detect 175 categories at AUC 0.97-0.99 by counting sign agreements, and from random seeds alone discovery scales to 1500 features per model. A trained probe adds only +0.018 AUC and converges to axis-aligned weights: the rotation dictionaries learn buys little. Signs are causally operative: they survive the attention projections, and flipping a concept's sign pattern in the live forward pass suppresses it. Reading and steering are separate roles in the same basis: a concept's reader dimensions are not its writer dimensions. The writer target is just as cheap, the sign of the summed unembedding rows over a few seeds, no training. Injected through the attention output pathway under closed-loop control, it steers concepts into fluent text on four language models (62-92% of twelve concepts). The signs were in the standard basis all along; the open problem is no longer finding the right rotation but cataloging what each dimension encodes.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.

Builds on

18 of 24 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  3. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
  4. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  5. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
  6. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  7. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
  8. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
  9. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  10. 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 922
  11. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
  12. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
6 more
  1. 2021AST: Audio Spectrogram Transformercited by 643
  2. 2023Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lenscited by 623
  3. 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 191
  4. 2018Net2Vec: Quantifying and Explaining how Concepts are Encoded by Filters in Deep Neural Networkscited by 129
  5. 2025Steering CLIP's vision transformer with sparse autoencoderscited by 38
  6. 2025Learning Interpretable Features in Audio Latent Spaces via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.