mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Viral Proteins Reveal Geometry of Protein Language Models

arXiv 2606.12609 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2026cs.LG q-bio.QMcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Protein language models are trained on highly imbalanced datasets, raising the question of how they represent underrepresented biological sequences. Using viral proteins as a case study across ESM model families, we identify a dominant nativeness axis in embedding space, aligned with masked reconstruction perplexity, that orders sequences from well-modeled cellular proteins through viral proteins to shuffled and random sequences. Scaling contracts this axis unevenly across viral families. Despite this, protein language model embeddings retain viral-specific signal: viral proteins remain linearly separable beyond zero-shot perplexity and shallow sequence features. Together, these results suggest that pLM representations are structured by a general notion of nativeness while preserving information specific to distinct biological groups.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.

Builds on

7 of 50 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  2. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  3. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
  4. 2021Autoregressive Diffusion Modelscited by 210
  5. 2022ProGen2: Exploring the Boundaries of Protein Language Modelscited by 159
  6. 2024InterPLM: Discovering Interpretable Features in Protein Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 66
  7. 2026Why Larger Models Learn More: Effects of Capacity, Interference, and Rare-Task Retentioncited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.