Viral Proteins Reveal Geometry of Protein Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Protein language models are trained on highly imbalanced datasets, raising the question of how they represent underrepresented biological sequences. Using viral proteins as a case study across ESM model families, we identify a dominant nativeness axis in embedding space, aligned with masked reconstruction perplexity, that orders sequences from well-modeled cellular proteins through viral proteins to shuffled and random sequences. Scaling contracts this axis unevenly across viral families. Despite this, protein language model embeddings retain viral-specific signal: viral proteins remain linearly separable beyond zero-shot perplexity and shallow sequence features. Together, these results suggest that pLM representations are structured by a general notion of nativeness while preserving information specific to distinct biological groups.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.
Builds on
7 of 50 references.
References · 7
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
- 2021Autoregressive Diffusion Modelscited by 210
- 2022ProGen2: Exploring the Boundaries of Protein Language Modelscited by 159
- 2024InterPLM: Discovering Interpretable Features in Protein Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 66
- 2026Why Larger Models Learn More: Effects of Capacity, Interference, and Rare-Task Retentioncited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.