mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Arbor: Tree Search as a Cognition Layer for Autonomous Agents

arXiv 2606.12563 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Arbor is a multi-agent framework that introduces structured tree search as a cognition layer for autonomous agents operating in large, stateful action spaces. Prior autonomous optimization systems operate on isolated targets with stateless evaluation. Arbor instead maintains an explicit search tree of scored hypotheses that serves as the shared working memory across agents, evolving with every measurement, treating failures as diagnostic signal that reshapes subsequent exploration, and expanding as prior successes shift the bottleneck distribution. We validate Arbor on full-stack LLM inference optimization, a domain where achieving peak performance has historically required coordinated effort from engineering teams across the application, framework, compiler, kernel, and hardware stack. Arbor pairs an Orchestrator agent, which drives optimization by delegating to Domain Specialists across the inference stack, with a Critic agent that safeguards stability through root-cause analysis, introspection, and measurement validation -- a checks-and-balances architecture where neither agent can unilaterally drive the system. Agent capabilities are decomposed into hard skills (domain expertise) and soft skills (coordination protocols that determine how contributions compose), enabling fully autonomous multi-day campaigns. Arbor achieves up to 193% inference throughput-latency Pareto improvement over vendor-optimized baselines, while a single agent without the harness plateaus at +33% throughput improvement and crashes irrecoverably within hours. Arbor generalizes to multiple generations of hardware platform, and run-to-run variance is within 2 percentage points demonstrating that the method is hardware-agnostic and reproducible.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 7 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.

Builds on

7 of 12 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Autonomous Evolution of EDA Tools: Multi-Agent Self-Evolved ABC16 Apr
  2. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework1 Aug

Other references · 5

  1. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  2. 2020Ansor: Generating High-Performance Tensor Programs for Deep Learningcited by 199
  3. 2025STARK: Strategic Team of Agents for Refining Kernelscited by 23
  4. 2025AccelOpt: A Self-Improving LLM Agentic System for AI Accelerator Kernel Optimizationcited by 21
  5. 2026KernelSkill: A Multi-Agent Framework for GPU Kernel Optimizationcited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025ReAcTree: Hierarchical LLM Agent Trees with Control Flow for Long-Horizon Task Planning
  2. 2025A Multi-Agent Framework for Stateful Inference-Time Search
  3. 2026CEDAR: Agent-Orchestrated Tree Search for Goal-Directed Optimization of Complex Systems
  4. 2024Tree Search for Language Model Agents
  5. 2026SkillVine: Agent Skill Evolution via Branching Exploration
  6. 2026FML-bench: A Controlled Study of AI Research Agent Strategies from the Perspective of Search Dynamics
  7. 2025Orchestrator: Active Inference for Multi-Agent Systems in Long-Horizon Tasks
  8. 2025MASPRM: Multi-Agent System Process Reward Model