Robustness Verification of Recurrent Neural Networks with Abstraction Refinement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Certified local robustness verification for recurrent neural networks (RNNs) is challenging because approximation errors introduced by nonlinear relaxations can propagate through recurrent connections and accumulate over time. As a result, scalable linear bound propagation methods often become overly conservative and fail to certify inputs that are in fact robust, especially when many pre-activation intervals cross zero. We propose an abstraction-refinement framework for RNN verification that partitions such intervals to remove the dominant relaxation error: on each refined branch, ReLU becomes exact, and smooth activations such as tanh and sigmoid admit substantially tighter linear envelopes. To control the combinatorial cost of splitting in long sequences, we introduce a SHAP-guided timestep selection strategy that ranks hidden states by their contribution to the verification objective and refines only the most critical timesteps in temporal order. Experiments on CIFAR10 and MNIST stroke benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements in verification success and robustness-margin tightness over abstraction-only baselines, while exposing clear runtime trade-offs between ReLU and tanh models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.
Builds on
18 of 29 references.
References · 18
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
- 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
- 2013Speech Recognition with Deep Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 666
- 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 439
- 2019Branch and Bound for Piecewise Linear Neural Network Verificationcited by 138
- 2024Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-Bound for General Nonlinearitiescited by 47
- 2021Improved Branch and Bound for Neural Network Verification via Lagrangian Decompositioncited by 44
6 more
- 2019POPQORN: Quantifying Robustness of Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 36
- 2024Scalable Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-bound Inferred Cutting Planescited by 33
- 2021Fooling LiDAR Perception via Adversarial Trajectory Perturbationcited by 25
- 2020Scalable Polyhedral Verification of Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 20
- 2021Certified Robustness to Programmable Transformations in LSTMscited by 18
- 2020DiffRNN: Differential Verification of Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.