mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ToolSense: A Diagnostic Framework for Auditing Parametric Tool Knowledge in LLMs

arXiv 2606.12451 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2026cs.AI cs.IR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models deployed as agents over large tool catalogs face a critical tool-retrieval bottleneck. As embedding-based retrieval approaches rely on compact encoders that may under-capture specialized tool semantics, parametric tool retrieval addresses this by encoding each tool as a virtual token appended to the LLM vocabulary, fine-tuned in two stages (memorization then retrieval SFT) to use the LLM as a retriever, achieving strong performance on standard ToolBench retrieval benchmarks. Yet these benchmarks use verbose, fully-specified queries, and their evaluation applies constrained decoding that restricts outputs to valid token paths, neither reveals whether the model actually understands its tools. We introduce ToolSense, an open-source LLM-powered diagnostic framework that takes any tool catalog as input and automatically generates three benchmarks: a Realistic Retrieval Benchmark (RRB) with queries at three ambiguity tiers, an MCQ probing benchmark, and a QA probing benchmark. Applying ToolSense to ToolBench (~47k tools) and evaluating five parametric model training configurations reveals a knowledge-retrieval dissociation: on RRB queries, several configurations collapse by ~50-64 percentage points compared to fully-specified ToolBench benchmarks, falling below the embedding-model baseline. Additionally, despite strong retrieval performance, some models score near-random on factual probes, suggesting a knowledge-retrieval dissociation. We open-source the ToolSense framework and the ToolBench diagnostic benchmarks at https://github.com/SAP/toolsense.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

Builds on

20 of 43 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  4. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  5. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  6. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  7. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  8. 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
  9. 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
  10. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  11. 2023Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIscited by 1,302
  12. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,046
8 more
  1. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 770
  2. 2020Autoregressive Entity Retrievalcited by 333
  3. 2024LoRA Learns Less and Forgets Lesscited by 313
  4. 2019Representation Degeneration Problem in Training Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 250
  5. 2022Transformer Memory as a Differentiable Search Indexcited by 242
  6. 2021All Bark and No Bite: Rogue Dimensions in Transformer Language Models Obscure Representational Qualitycited by 150
  7. 2022A Neural Corpus Indexer for Document Retrievalcited by 107
  8. 2024ToolGen: Unified Tool Retrieval and Calling via Generationcited by 72

Built on by

Not cited yet.