mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Bridging the Modality Gap in Forensic Image Retrieval

arXiv 2606.12294 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2026cs.CV eess.IVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated image retrieval plays an increasingly critical role in modern forensic analysis, supporting investigative workflows that rely on efficient comparison of visual evidence. While prior work has focused primarily on developing and optimizing multimodal retrieval systems, limited attention has been paid to evaluating the forensic applicability of these technologies across diverse real-world scenarios. In this study, we present a unified retrieval framework adapted to four key forensic tasks: (1) tattoo image retrieval given a tattoo query image; (2) tattoo retrieval guided by human-expert textual descriptions, modelling the common situation where a witness verbally describes a tattoo; (3) tattoo retrieval from hand-drawn sketches; and (4) face retrieval from forensic face sketches. Our system leverages a multimodal large language model (MLLM) to automatically generate structured textual descriptions for all queries and gallery images, followed by sentence-transformer embedding for text-based comparison. We evaluate retrieval using visual-only embeddings, text-only embeddings and a multimodal fusion strategy that combines text- and image-based similarity scores derived from state-of-the-art visual feature extractors relevant to each task. The fusion of modalities consistently improves retrieval precision and robustness, especially in scenarios where visual information is limited or noisy (e.g., sketches, partial tattoos, or fragmented witness statements). This work highlights the forensic value of a unified multimodal retrieval pipeline and demonstrates how modern MLLMs can operationalize challenging forensic tasks that traditionally rely on manual expert analysis. Our results position multimodal retrieval as a promising tool for supporting investigative workflows involving tattoos, facial composites, and witness descriptions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.

Builds on

11 of 40 references.

References · 11

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 981
  3. 2024DeepSeek-VL2: Mixture-of-Experts Vision-Language Models for Advanced Multimodal Understandingcited by 572
  4. 2018MobileFaceNets: Efficient CNNs for Accurate Real-Time Face Verification on Mobile Devicescited by 182
  5. 2024Efficient Multimodal Learning from Data-centric Perspectivecited by 122
  6. 2023Vision-by-Language for Training-Free Compositional Image Retrievalcited by 103
  7. 2024Training-free Zero-shot Composed Image Retrieval via Weighted Modality Fusion and Similaritycited by 12
  8. 2024Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models for Improving Digital Forensic Investigation Efficiencycited by 7
  9. 2018Tattoo Image Search at Scale: Joint Detection and Compact Representation Learningcited by 4
  10. 2024TattTRN: Template Reconstruction Network for Tattoo Retrievalcited by 2
  11. 2025Training-Free In-Context Forensic Chain for Image Manipulation Detection and Localizationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Detection of Hate and Threat in Digital Forensics: A Case-Driven Multimodal Approach
  2. 2026ForensicZoom: Adaptive Visual Inspection with Multimodal LLMs for Industrial-Grade Face Forgery Detection
  3. 2025ForenX: Towards Explainable AI-Generated Image Detection with Multimodal Large Language Models
  4. 2025FORGE: Forensic Reasoning with Grounded Evidence
  5. 2025HAMLET-FFD: Hierarchical Adaptive Multi-modal Learning Embeddings Transformation for Face Forgery Detection
  6. 2026ForensicZip: More Tokens are Better but Not Necessary in Forensic Vision-Language Models
  7. 2026AEGIS: A Holistic Benchmark for Evaluating Forensic Analysis of AI-Generated Academic Images
  8. 2026ForensicFormer: Hierarchical Multi-Scale Reasoning for Cross-Domain Image Forgery Detection