mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Finding Multiple Interpretations in Datasets

arXiv 2606.12277 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose an approach to finding sets of similar-performing models (in terms of loss/accuracy measurements) with highly different context-aware characteristics. Through experiments on the METABRIC dataset, we show that the proposed method finds multiple models with highly different gene expressions than those found by the control methodology without performance penalties. We argue that the proposed methodology is important whenever one aims to analyze any global characteristic of a model to extract insight into the underlying phenomenon being studied.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.

Builds on

4 of 14 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 496
  2. 2020Fast Differentiable Sorting and Rankingcited by 197
  3. 2018Two-Player Games for Efficient Non-Convex Constrained Optimizationcited by 55
  4. 2024In Defence of Post-hoc Explainabilitycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.