mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Higher-Order Token Interactions via Quantum Attention

arXiv 2606.11673 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2026quant-ph cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Standard dot-product self-attention computes, in a single layer, only pairwise (order-2) interactions between tokens; representing a generic order-k interaction is known to require either super-quadratic resources in one layer or composition across depth. We introduce Quantum Higher-Order Attention (QHA), a shallow, hardware-realizable quantum attention head that, via data re-uploading and an all-to-all non-Clifford entangler, synthesizes order-k token interactions inside the circuit and exposes them through a local single-qubit read-out. We prove (i) an expressivity separation: any single standard self-attention layer with embedding dimension m, H heads and p-bit precision satisfying mHp=o(N/loglog N) cannot represent the order-k correlation family that one QHA head represents with circuit depth O(log k) (O(k) two-qubit gates); and (ii) a trainability guarantee for its local-design instantiation: with a local read-out and O(log n) depth the gradient variance is Omega(1/poly(n)) (no barren plateau), which we confirm empirically -- while being explicit that the more expressive all-to-all instantiation we benchmark is trained empirically and shows exponentially decaying gradients. Empirically, at a 6.5× smaller parameter budget, QHA generalizes hidden-subset parity of every order k≤6 from disjoint inputs, whereas the larger classical attention head collapses past order~2; consistent with theory, the size of the advantage tracks the target's Fourier degree - largest for parity and shrinking when low-order structure is present. As an application, QHA serves as a compact high-order interaction detector across three domains - genetic epistasis, learning-parity-with-noise, and graph triangle detection - reaching the noise ceiling at the smallest parameter budget where field-standard linear methods fail.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.

Builds on

18 of 24 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Rethinking Attention with Performerscited by 1,601
  3. 2018Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapescited by 630
  4. 2020The effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum machine learning modelscited by 333
  5. 2019Theoretical Limitations of Self-Attention in Neural Sequence Modelscited by 288
  6. 2019Transformer Dissection: A Unified Understanding of Transformer's Attention via the Lens of Kernelcited by 213
  7. 2021Inductive Biases and Variable Creation in Self-Attention Mechanismscited by 144
  8. 2022The merged-staircase property: a necessary and nearly sufficient condition for SGD learning of sparse functions on two-layer neural networkscited by 142
  9. 2023Representational Strengths and Limitations of Transformerscited by 133
  10. 2020Absence of Barren Plateaus in Quantum Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 125
  11. 2024Better than classical? The subtle art of benchmarking quantum machine learning modelscited by 85
  12. 2023Does provable absence of barren plateaus imply classical simulability?cited by 80
6 more
  1. 2024Transformers, parallel computation, and logarithmic depthcited by 79
  2. 2018A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systemscited by 70
  3. 2022Simplicity Bias in Transformers and their Ability to Learn Sparse Boolean Functionscited by 70
  4. 2022Quantum Vision Transformerscited by 48
  5. 2025Quantum Doubly Stochastic Transformerscited by 6
  6. 2026Do Quantum Transformers Help? A Systematic VQC Architecture Comparison on Tabular Benchmarkscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.