mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

OSCS-SupCon: Orthogonal Sigmoid-based Common and Style Supervised Contrastive Learning for Robust Feature Disentanglement

arXiv 2606.11233 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Supervised Contrastive Learning (SupCon) has achieved strong performance by explicitly modeling pairwise relationships among samples. However, existing SupCon-based methods suffer from two key limitations: negative-sample dilution induced by the standard InfoNCE loss, and feature-space entanglement caused by the lack of explicit constraints separating category-relevant (common) and category-irrelevant (style) features. These limitations reduce feature discriminability and generalization ability. To address these issues, we propose OSCS-SupCon (Orthogonal Sigmoid-based Common and Style Supervised Contrastive Learning), a unified framework that combines a sigmoid-based pairwise contrastive objective with explicit orthogonality constraints. Specifically, we introduce a sigmoid-based contrastive loss with two learnable parameters, temperature and bias, which adaptively modulate pairwise decision boundaries and alleviate negative-sample dilution. Furthermore, we enforce orthogonality between common and style feature subspaces via a linear projection with ReLU nonlinearity, thereby reducing feature overlap and improving disentanglement of style-irrelevant representations. Extensive experiments on six benchmark datasets demonstrate that OSCS-SupCon consistently outperforms state-of-the-art supervised contrastive learning methods across multiple backbone architectures. In particular, on the fine-grained CUB200-2011 dataset with a ResNet-18 backbone, the proposed method achieves a 3.4% improvement in classification accuracy over CS-SupCon, highlighting its robustness and generalization capability. Ablation studies further confirm the effectiveness of each component.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

18 of 31 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  4. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  5. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  6. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
  7. 2019Data-Efficient Image Recognition with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 672
  8. 2019Multi-Similarity Loss with General Pair Weighting for Deep Metric Learningcited by 368
  9. 2021Co-learning: Learning from Noisy Labels with Self-supervisioncited by 50
  10. 2019Self-Supervised Learning For Few-Shot Image Classificationcited by 44
  11. 2023Which Features are Learnt by Contrastive Learning? On the Role of Simplicity Bias in Class Collapse and Feature Suppressioncited by 30
  12. 2021Deep Metric Learning for Few-Shot Image Classification: A Review of Recent Developmentscited by 23
6 more
  1. 2019Visual Explanation for Deep Metric Learningcited by 14
  2. 2022Rethinking Collaborative Metric Learning: Toward an Efficient Alternative without Negative Samplingcited by 14
  3. 2021Self-Contrastive Learning: Single-viewed Supervised Contrastive Framework using Sub-networkcited by 5
  4. 2023Deep Intra-Image Contrastive Learning for Weakly Supervised One-Step Person Searchcited by 4
  5. 2022Guided Deep Metric Learningcited by 3
  6. 2018Exponential Discriminative Metric Embedding in Deep Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.