mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimizing 2D Input Representations and Sub-phase Fusion Strategies for Differential Diagnosis of Asthma and COPD Using CNN- and GRU-Based Networks

arXiv 2606.10972 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2026eess.AS cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study aims to explore the performance of the VAR model in comparison with mel-frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) matrices and log-mel spectrograms using deep learning. In pulmonary sound classification, spectrogram-based representations suffer from inconsistent temporal dimensions due to varying respiratory cycle durations. Along with traditional trimming/zero-padding, adaptive-length windowing was presented to fix their temporal dimensions. Their spectral and temporal dimensions were optimized by testing a range of parameters. Different convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures were employed to extract features from the two-dimensional representations obtained over the sub-phases. The extracted sub-phase features were then fused using various strategies including direct concatenation, gated recurrent unit (GRU) network and GRU with attention mechanism. Model performances were assessed through respiratory cycle-based evaluation and subject-based evaluation comprising multiple respiratory cycles. Several data augmentation techniques were also studied to cope with limitations in data size. The best cycle-based F1-score (0.877) was obtained using the MFCC matrices with thirteen coefficients and 64-point time resolution per sub-phase representation followed by direct feature concatenation, and the best subject-based F1-score (0.855) was obtained using the MFCC matrices with thirteen coefficients and 256-point time resolution per full-cycle representation, both obtained by adaptive-length windowing. Augmentation degraded the performance of models overall, yet mixup augmentation was the best among the methods tested. MFCC outperformed log-mel spectrogram and VAR model in differentiation of asthma and COPD. Sophisticated fusion strategies did not improve the diagnosis. Augmentation did not contribute, demonstrating the significance of authentic data in pulmonary sound studies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2026.

Builds on

11 of 52 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  4. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  5. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  6. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  7. 2018An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,447
  8. 2018A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Learning for Image Captioningcited by 213
  9. 2020Jointly Fine-Tuning "BERT-like" Self Supervised Models to Improve Multimodal Speech Emotion Recognitioncited by 38
  10. 2020Extracting low-dimensional psychological representations from convolutional neural networkscited by 16
  11. 2022Measuring Overfitting in Convolutional Neural Networks using Adversarial Perturbations and Label Noisecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.