mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Perception to Action: Can UI Interventions Foster Sustainable LLM Chatbot

arXiv 2606.10861 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2026cs.SE cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM-powered chatbots are increasingly embedded in everyday workflows, raising sustainability concerns due to their energy use. Most mitigation strategies emphasize model or infrastructure efficiency, while the user-interface (UI) layer remains underexplored despite its potential to shape interaction behavior. We investigate whether sustainability-oriented UI interventions can increase users' energy awareness and encourage more energy-responsible chatbot use without reducing usability. We first conducted a baseline survey with 77 participants to assess awareness and receptiveness to intervention concepts. Guided by prior work on persuasive technology and choice architecture, we implemented a web-based chatbot prototype with a three-mode switch (Energy-efficient, Balanced, Performance), per-response energy feedback, pre-send energy estimates, a usage metrics dashboard, and energy analogies. We then evaluated the prototype in a five-day field study with 11 participants. In the baseline survey, 94.8% of respondents reported at least some awareness of AI energy use, yet 88.3% misestimated actual consumption. Although concern about environmental impact was high, only 39.0% indicated willingness to accept a performance trade-off for lower energy use. In the field study, Energy-efficient mode accounted for 55.8% of logged prompts, while 90.9% self-reported actively choosing Eco-mode when high accuracy was not required. Participants did not reduce prompt length, suggesting mode switching as the primary behavioral mechanism. Sustainability-oriented UI interventions can improve awareness and support more energy-responsible interaction patterns in LLM chatbots. These effects are best interpreted as behavioral and model-based estimates that complement backend efficiency work, and the provided prototype and replication package support further research on energy-aware conversational AI design.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2026.

Builds on

12 of 49 references.

References · 12

  1. 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,254
  2. 2024Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 152
  3. 2024DynamoLLM: Designing LLM Inference Clusters for Performance and Energy Efficiencycited by 112
  4. 2023A Systematic Review of Green AIcited by 77
  5. 2025How Hungry is AI? Benchmarking Energy, Water, and Carbon Footprint of LLM Inferencecited by 76
  6. 2024Towards Greener LLMs: Bringing Energy-Efficiency to the Forefront of LLM Inferencecited by 61
  7. 2025Energy Considerations of Large Language Model Inference and Efficiency Optimizationscited by 55
  8. 2024Offline Energy-Optimal LLM Serving: Workload-Based Energy Models for LLM Inference on Heterogeneous Systemscited by 28
  9. 2024Towards Sustainable Large Language Model Servingcited by 12
  10. 2025Towards Sustainable NLP: Insights from Benchmarking Inference Energy in Large Language Modelscited by 11
  11. 2025Greening AI-enabled Systems with Software Engineering: A Research Agenda for Environmentally Sustainable AI Practicescited by 8
  12. 2024Green My LLM: Studying the key factors affecting the energy consumption of code assistantscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.