mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Correcting Variable Importance Scored by Random Forests

arXiv 2606.10770 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2026stat.ME cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Variable importance produced by Random Forests (RF) is used widely in statistical data analysis, and has played an important role in a variety of tasks such as assisting model interpretation, model selection and diagnosis, and cost-bounded learning etc. However, the calculation of variable importance in RF does not take into account of the correlations among variables, and variables that are correlated to many other variables tend to receive a lower importance index or being completely masked (i.e., with an importance index near zero) by other strongly correlated variables. To prevent influence from unwanted correlated variables in calculating variable importance, we propose to group variables by their conditional correlations (conditional on the response variable). We explore two computationally efficient options, with one grouping variables individually, and then separates the variable of interest from all correlated variables, while the other uses clustering to group variables according to their pair-wise conditional correlations. Our experiments show that both lead to sensible corrections to the importance of variables.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2026.

Builds on

7 of 31 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  5. 2019Cost-sensitive Selection of Variables by Ensemble of Model Sequencescited by 2
  6. 2019Learning over inherently distributed datacited by 1
  7. 2025A Computational Approach to Improving Fairness in K-means Clusteringcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.