mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

POPSICLE: Benchmark Datasets for Segmentation and Localization in CryoET

arXiv 2606.10255 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2026eess.IV cs.CV cs.DLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cryo-electron tomography (cryoET) has emerged as a powerful tool in structural and cellular biology by enabling direct visualization of macromolecular structures within intact cells, thereby linking molecular architecture to cellular organization in a native context. Realizing the full potential of cryoET, however, increasingly depends on advances in computational analysis, particularly machine learning (ML), to interpret its complex and information-rich data. Despite rapid progress, ML development for cryoET remains bottlenecked by the lack of standardized, well-annotated benchmarks. Existing evaluations are typically small, task-specific, and are assembled in isolation, limiting robust comparisons across methods. Here, we present POPSICLE, a benchmark suite for cryoET segmentation and macromolecular localization built from the CryoET Data Portal - an open, ML-ready repository of tomographic data, metadata, and annotations. POPSICLE spans eukaryotic and prokaryotic systems, both purified and fully in situ samples, and dense voxel-wise segmentation as well as sparse localization tasks. Built on a living data resource, it can expand as new datasets and annotations become available. Baseline experiments reveal substantial variation in model rankings across tasks, underscoring the need for benchmarks tailored to the unique characteristics of cryoET rather than evaluation practices adapted from adjacent biomedical imaging domains. POPSICLE thus provides an open and extensible foundation for reproducible ML evaluation in cryoET.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

Builds on

6 of 36 references.

References · 6

  1. 2022Swin UNETR: Swin Transformers for Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumors in MRI Imagescited by 830
  2. 2024nnU-Net Revisited: A Call for Rigorous Validation in 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 240
  3. 2023MedNeXt: Transformer-driven Scaling of ConvNets for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 162
  4. 2022Towards a Guideline for Evaluation Metrics in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 60
  5. 2025nnInteractive: Redefining 3D Promptable Segmentationcited by 41
  6. 2024Touchstone Benchmark: Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating AI Algorithms for Medical Segmentation?cited by 31

Built on by

Not cited yet.